2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.neures.2004.09.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Determination of transverse relaxation rate for estimating iron deposits in central nervous system

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

6
45
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
6
45
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, the embalming solution was not drastically influencing tissue relaxation times. Relaxation times of our embalmed samples were similar to those of fresh tissues reported in the literature (22,27,28). Samples were removed with ceramic knives and plastic claws; the use of any metallic instrument was prohibited to avoid contamination.…”
Section: Samplesmentioning
confidence: 60%
“…Therefore, the embalming solution was not drastically influencing tissue relaxation times. Relaxation times of our embalmed samples were similar to those of fresh tissues reported in the literature (22,27,28). Samples were removed with ceramic knives and plastic claws; the use of any metallic instrument was prohibited to avoid contamination.…”
Section: Samplesmentioning
confidence: 60%
“…One method is the measurement of phase shift by using susceptibility-weighted imaging which uses local phase differences to map the iron [8,9] , but the phase shift is affected by the background field effects caused by air-tissue interfaces that lead to signal loss in tissues adjacent to these areas. Another method is the measurement of transverse relaxation rates R2 and R2 * (R2=1/T2, R2 * =1/T2 * ) or transverse relaxation time T2 and T2 * [10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17] . Though they are strongly affected by iron concentration, pathologic water content because of neuronal damage also influences R2 and R2 * , which can cause signal loss unrelated to the internal iron content of the tissue [8,12,18] .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…44 So in essence, R2 can be rendered somewhat insensitive by the water content in the brain, whereas R2* is susceptible to contributors other than iron, and R2' may have limited sensitivity. Sequences such as the gradient echo sampling of free induction decay and echo (GESFIDE) [45][46][47] and partially refocused interleaved multiple echo (PRIME) 38 allow the derivation of R2, R2*, and R2' from a single-pulse sequence. The GESFIDE sequence consists of two echo trains, the first after an excitation pulse, the second after a 180-degree refocusing pulse.…”
Section: Relaxometrymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The GESFIDE sequence consists of two echo trains, the first after an excitation pulse, the second after a 180-degree refocusing pulse. Hikita et al 47 studied various MRI sequences to see which of the metrics most accurately reflected brain iron, and they concluded that R2 obtained by GESFIDE sequence and R2 obtained by multiple spin echoes fitted to a single relaxation curve showed higher correlations with brain iron than R2' obtained by GESFIDE sequences. Yablonskiy et al 48 has proposed a variation on the GES-FIDE sequence called gradient echo sampling of the spin echo that samples only the rephasing and dephasing spin echo signal components, which they purport to have a lower signal-to-noise ratio compared to GESFIDE.…”
Section: Relaxometrymentioning
confidence: 99%