2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.talanta.2018.07.021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Determination of the contribution of humic substances to iron complexation in seawater by catalytic cathodic stripping voltammetry

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
81
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(84 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
2
81
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, relative contributions by groups like humic substances (HS; Laglera & van den Berg, ) and exopolymeric substances (Hassler et al, ) may be considerable. We know from a previous study on one station in the Arctic Ocean, also described in this paper, that the Fe‐binding organic binding sites consist for 62% of HS (Sukekava et al, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 70%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…However, relative contributions by groups like humic substances (HS; Laglera & van den Berg, ) and exopolymeric substances (Hassler et al, ) may be considerable. We know from a previous study on one station in the Arctic Ocean, also described in this paper, that the Fe‐binding organic binding sites consist for 62% of HS (Sukekava et al, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 70%
“…of the averages are calculated for each property and increments divided by ∆[HS] for DFe and [L t ] per mg SRFA across the TPD border. A conversion to equivalent [L t ] HS has been added using the conversion factor of 14.6 nM/mg after Sukekava et al (). DFe = dissolved Fe; CLE‐AdCSV = Competitive Ligand Exchange Adsorptive Stripping Voltammetry; HS = humic substance; TPD = TransPolar Drift; FDOM = fluorescent DOM.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations