2011
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-20338-1_85
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Determination of Tectonic Movements in the Swiss Alps Using GNSS and Levelling

Abstract: The Federal Office of Topography swisstopo is responsible for the maintenance of the coordinate reference frames in Switzerland. Beside the static reference frames, used for national surveying, the development of a kinematic model, mainly used for scientific investigations, is under development since many years. For

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

4
18
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
4
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…10), with highest uplift rates (> 1.0 mm yr −1 ) limited to stations located above ∼ 1000 m altitude. This is consistent with GPS and leveling results in the Swiss Alps where the most elevated region displays uplift rates up to 2 mm yr −1 (Brockmann et al, 2012). Although this correlation seems straightforward, it is not the altitude of the GPS site that matters but rather the mean elevation of the mountains surrounding the site.…”
Section: Velocity Solutionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…10), with highest uplift rates (> 1.0 mm yr −1 ) limited to stations located above ∼ 1000 m altitude. This is consistent with GPS and leveling results in the Swiss Alps where the most elevated region displays uplift rates up to 2 mm yr −1 (Brockmann et al, 2012). Although this correlation seems straightforward, it is not the altitude of the GPS site that matters but rather the mean elevation of the mountains surrounding the site.…”
Section: Velocity Solutionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…The discrepancy in uplift rates between the two near the Insubric Fault remains to be cleared (see compilation map in [142]). The GPS data of GNSS are taken from [151]. The uplift rates are relative to stable Europe, which may explain the discrepancy to the CHTRF data.…”
Section: Central Alps Of Switzerlandmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The discrepancy in uplift rates between the two near the Insubric Fault remains to be cleared (see compilation map in [133]). The GPS data of GNSS are taken from [142]. The uplift rates are relative to stable Europe, which may explain the discrepancy to the CHTRF data.…”
Section: Central Alps Of Switzerlandmentioning
confidence: 99%