2018
DOI: 10.26724/2079-8334-2018-1-63-19-22
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Determination of Normal Cephalometric Parameters by J. McNamara Method for Ukrainian Boys and Girls

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Unfortunately, the work of domestic scientists on this subject is rather small [13,16,17,22,23]. This greatly №32, Page 56-62 complicates the use of techniques of cephalometric analysis of lateral teleroentgenograms and in particular the Ricketts method, which in turn impairs the provision of orthodontic care to the Ukrainian population.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unfortunately, the work of domestic scientists on this subject is rather small [13,16,17,22,23]. This greatly №32, Page 56-62 complicates the use of techniques of cephalometric analysis of lateral teleroentgenograms and in particular the Ricketts method, which in turn impairs the provision of orthodontic care to the Ukrainian population.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It should be noted that according to our research, most of the cephalometric parameters obtained in Podillia young men and women with orthognathic bite didn't have significant differences with the data of the parameters obtained by G. Shmut [5], C. Stiner [8] and A.M. Schwartz [6]. Numerous differences in the cephalometric parameters used in Charles H. Tweed International Foundation analysis with the results obtained in Ukrainian young men and women with orthognathic bite have been set for angles (regardless of sex, the smaller angles of FMA and POr_OcP and larger IMRA angles values), so and for linear dimensions (larger PFH distances for young men and smaller AFH distances for young women and AFH_PFH ratios for young men and women) [15], as well as almost half of the cephalometric parameters obtained in young men and women from Podillia with orthognathic bite with marked differences in the magnitude of these parameters derived by J. McNamara [14].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…But do there exist unified standards and standards for the planning of profile metric characteristics? With the development of science, more and more researches has been accumulated that proves the existence of statistically significant ethnic, sex [11,24], age and constitutional differences in facial characteristics [1,6,8,[13][14][15]30].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%