2017
DOI: 10.1080/1354750x.2016.1256428
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Determination of natural moisturizing factors in the skin: Raman microspectroscopy versus HPLC

Abstract: Both methods showed comparable performance, choice of method will rather be influenced by practical consideration.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
33
0
5

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
3
33
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…For left cheek zone (Figure B), increased intensities are seen in bands of 1275 and 1454 cm −1 . These bands are related to different proteins, being the band of 1454 cm −1 the one that is correlated to Raman spectra of collagen reported in previous works …”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 67%
“…For left cheek zone (Figure B), increased intensities are seen in bands of 1275 and 1454 cm −1 . These bands are related to different proteins, being the band of 1454 cm −1 the one that is correlated to Raman spectra of collagen reported in previous works …”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 67%
“…30% of the SC depth [16], determining the highest skin barrier function at this depth. These results correlate with further parameters sensitive to the skin barrier function that were determined using in vivo CRM, such as the NMF concentration [17], or the hydrogen bonding state of water [18]. One perception from these studies was, that the maximal skin barrier function occurs at the depths 20-40% of the SC thickness.…”
supporting
confidence: 58%
“…38,39 This results in characteristic Raman spectra, which are noninvasive molecular measurements of filaggrin degradation products within the SC. 40 Koppes et al 41 compared both RMS and HPLC. They showed a strong correlation between the 2 methods, despite the methods measuring different NMF components.…”
Section: Measuring Filaggrin Protein Expression In Vivomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, unlike RMS, it requires further processing for HPLC analysis, prolonging the time to results. 41 O'Regan et al 13 looked at the relationship between Raman NMF signatures of the stratum corneum and FLG mutation status in patients with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis.…”
Section: Measuring Filaggrin Protein Expression In Vivomentioning
confidence: 99%