2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.chroma.2013.12.071
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Determination of lipophilic marine toxins in mussels. Quantification and confirmation criteria using high resolution mass spectrometry

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
32
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
3
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Overall, standard deviations of the error were slightly lower on the Orbitrap (0.46 ppm) compared to the QToF (0.58 ppm). These results showed a good stability in mass measurement for both instruments and were consistent with previously published mass accuracy data [14,15]. For all toxins on all instruments, mean calibration curves obtained from triplicate injections of methanol, SPATT and mussel solutions showed good linearity (R 2 > 0.99) (see Supplementary material, Table S4).…”
Section: Methods Selection and Performancesupporting
confidence: 86%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Overall, standard deviations of the error were slightly lower on the Orbitrap (0.46 ppm) compared to the QToF (0.58 ppm). These results showed a good stability in mass measurement for both instruments and were consistent with previously published mass accuracy data [14,15]. For all toxins on all instruments, mean calibration curves obtained from triplicate injections of methanol, SPATT and mussel solutions showed good linearity (R 2 > 0.99) (see Supplementary material, Table S4).…”
Section: Methods Selection and Performancesupporting
confidence: 86%
“…In general the good detection limits obtained with HRMS for the other toxins illustrated the capacity for quantitative screening of toxins in comparison with more conventional LRMS approaches. The significant added advantage of HRMS is the ability to perform full scan and MS/MS acquisitions simultaneously [15,16], and thus enable retrospectively evaluation of data.…”
Section: Accuracy and Detection Limitsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…High resolution MS constitutes an alternative technique to determine the molecular mass, and provide structural data of phycotoxins and unknown bioactive molecules from toxic shellfish extracts with high accuracy and sensitivity. 131,132 However, when certified standards are not available, uncertainty – a parameter that provides an interval within which the true value is believed to lie at a set level of confidence – becomes difficult to estimate and the data are qualitative at best. 132 Total synthesis of CI toxins is of paramount importance for unambiguous detection and risk assessment.…”
Section: Current Methods For Detection Of CI Toxinsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent years, these groups have been routinely monitored in shellfish using LC-MS/MS,based methods as proposed by the European Union Reference Laboratory for Marine Biotoxins (EURLMB). However, the use of full-scan high-resolution MS has recently been proposed as an alternative analytical platform for the quantitative measurement of marine lipophilic toxins in shellfish [23,24] and excellent validation data have been obtained with this methodology [25]. Indeed the quantitative performance of HR-Orbitrap MS has proved to be even better than MS/MS and excellent validation data have been obtained with this methodology [25].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 92%