2003
DOI: 10.1016/s1383-5866(02)00179-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Determination of gas–liquid reaction kinetics with a stirred cell reactor

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
65
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 81 publications
(67 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
2
65
0
Order By: Relevance
“…7) [35][36][37] . Although gravimetric methods are typically used for solid sorbent investigations, that technique is complicated by water exchange in and out of the hybrid liquidsolid capsule system we investigate here.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…7) [35][36][37] . Although gravimetric methods are typically used for solid sorbent investigations, that technique is complicated by water exchange in and out of the hybrid liquidsolid capsule system we investigate here.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To measure the activity and stability of the carbonic anhydrase, the enzyme was added to the MDEA solution and incubated at the specified incubation temperature. Periodically, the solution was removed from the incubator and adjusted to the assay temperature and assayed for activity using a stirred cell reactor (SCR) as described elsewhere (31). Briefly, 100 mL of enzyme plus MDEA solution was added to a 500-mL (total reactor volume) SCR.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After the temperature and pressure reached equilibrium, the reactor was pressurized with carbon dioxide gas to about 10 pounds per square inch gauge (psig), after which the flow of CO 2 was stopped. The pressure drop with time (corresponding to the absorption of CO 2 into the solvent) was recorded, along with the temperature, and these data were used to calculate the overall rate constant for absorption (k OV ) using the equations described elsewhere (31). After the assay was complete, the solution was returned to the incubation temperature until the next assay was performed.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…29,46 The equation derived from Perry (1973), and reported by Mandel (2010), is quite often used for engineering purpose: 16 Using their values of C 2 and C 3 (respectively 0.11 and 0.66), a value of C 1 equal to 0.542, 23% lower than the one found by Kucka et al, was determined by numerical resolution (the model is represented in Fig. 3).…”
Section: Kl Calculationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This technique has been widely applied to determine reaction rate constants involved in chlorine hydrolysis, H 2 S absorption in chlorine solution, flue desulfurization, NOx absorption or CO 2 capture in amine solutions. [5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16] Most of time, reactive absorption is applied using (i) batch reactors in which the gas and liquid phases are separated by a flat interface (stirred-cell reactor). The absorption rate, and consecutively the reaction rate, are deduced 4 pressure at the contactor outlet was nearly identical to the inlet one, and only the reactant concentration decay over time was recorded to determine the mass-transfer and chemical reaction rates.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%