2018
DOI: 10.1002/mde.2922
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Determinants of process innovation introductions: Evidence from 115 developing countries

Abstract: This paper examines determinants of process innovation introductions across 115 (mostly) developing countries. Empirical research on process innovations lags behind product innovations. Accounting for firm characteristics, R&D, regulations and taxes, and corruption, results show that sole proprietors and R&D‐performing firms were more likely to introduce innovations, whereas greater prosperity made them less likely to do so. Corruption had a greasing effect, whereas firms in island nations were less likely to … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
31
2
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
(71 reference statements)
2
31
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The positive effect of bribe paying by Chinese companies in order to overcome bureaucratic barriers was revealed in their research by Xu, Zhang, and Yano (2017). Also, Goel and Nelson (2018) suggested the positive effect of corruption on innovation based on their extensive research regarding developing countries. This is evidenced by Chandan and Arup (2015) in their research study on Indian companies, emphasizing that paying bribe to governmental structures and institutions' officials has a positive influence on innovation in companies.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…The positive effect of bribe paying by Chinese companies in order to overcome bureaucratic barriers was revealed in their research by Xu, Zhang, and Yano (2017). Also, Goel and Nelson (2018) suggested the positive effect of corruption on innovation based on their extensive research regarding developing countries. This is evidenced by Chandan and Arup (2015) in their research study on Indian companies, emphasizing that paying bribe to governmental structures and institutions' officials has a positive influence on innovation in companies.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…A recent study by Krammer () uses microdata on 30 emerging economies to examine the impact of bribery on product innovation introductions, taking account of formal and informal institutions (Goel & Nelson, ), on the other hand, consider the introduction of process innovations). Although making no distinction between design and utility innovations, the study finds that the relationship between bribery and new product introduction is weakened by the quality of institutions.…”
Section: Literature and Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(Audretsch & Dohse, 2007) tried to examine the link between the performance of the latest technology companies measured in terms of employment with geographic location and found that firm's growth was not influenced by firm characteristics nor firms geographic location. On the contrary, (Goel & Nelson, 2018) found that companies set in Island exhibited less performance in terms of innovation than those set in mainland counterpart. Island companies face less pressure to innovate.…”
Section: Firm Locationmentioning
confidence: 86%