1995
DOI: 10.1016/0003-4878(95)00024-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Determinants of dust and endotoxin exposure of pig farmers: Development of a control strategy using empirical modelling

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

5
53
0
1

Year Published

1997
1997
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 63 publications
(59 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
5
53
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This is in accordance with the association found between automated feeding systems and chronic symptoms in our former study [49] and with the slightly lower lung function for farmers with automated systems found in that study and earlier by Bongers and co workers [9]. In another part of our study [37] we showed that wet feeding is associated with lower exposure to dust, as reported also by Attwood and coworkers [2]. Both in this and former studies, there is evidence that the combination of automation with dry feed is associated with adverse health effects.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 94%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This is in accordance with the association found between automated feeding systems and chronic symptoms in our former study [49] and with the slightly lower lung function for farmers with automated systems found in that study and earlier by Bongers and co workers [9]. In another part of our study [37] we showed that wet feeding is associated with lower exposure to dust, as reported also by Attwood and coworkers [2]. Both in this and former studies, there is evidence that the combination of automation with dry feed is associated with adverse health effects.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 94%
“…They were considered to be consistently asymptomatic. Ninety-eight of the consistently symptomatic and 100 of the con sistently asymptomatic were randomly selected for a follow-up programme that included measurements of environmental and personal exposure in their own confinement units [37]. AH worked at least 5 h per day in pig farming.…”
Section: Study Populationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition to bedding materials, exposure levels in this study to some extent might likely be influenced by other potential determinants that we did not include, such as climatic conditions on the measuring days, type of ventilation and ventilation rate, methods and intervals on cleaning, and sampling season as suggested elsewhere. 3,6,30 The variability of exposure levels between workers and within workers over time were high in our study, consistent with findings from previous studies. 1,4,7,19 Final exposure models in this study explained a significant proportion of between-worker variability for inhalable dust, endotoxin, and b(1-3)-glucan levels.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…The main explanation for within-worker exposure variability could be task rotations over time as previous studies demonstrated some associations between specific tasks (e.g., feeding and sweeping) performed and elevated exposure levels to dust and endotoxin. 3,4 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation