Handbook of Research on Techno-Entrepreneurship 2007
DOI: 10.4337/9781847205551.00017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Determinants and Consequences of University Spin-off Activity: A Conceptual Framework

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
22
0
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
22
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Henceforth, university-based firms are defined as companies that were either developed by faculty members based on their own research or created specifically to capitalize on academic research. 2 This definition is in keeping with the literature (Colombo, Mustar, & Wright, 2010;Lockett et al, 2005;O'Shea et al, 2008;Rothaermel et al, 2007;Shane, 2004;Shane & Stuart, 2002). On a deeper level, the academic founders may or may not be still actively involved in managing the firm at the time of the IPO.…”
Section: Treatment and Control Samplementioning
confidence: 96%
“…Henceforth, university-based firms are defined as companies that were either developed by faculty members based on their own research or created specifically to capitalize on academic research. 2 This definition is in keeping with the literature (Colombo, Mustar, & Wright, 2010;Lockett et al, 2005;O'Shea et al, 2008;Rothaermel et al, 2007;Shane, 2004;Shane & Stuart, 2002). On a deeper level, the academic founders may or may not be still actively involved in managing the firm at the time of the IPO.…”
Section: Treatment and Control Samplementioning
confidence: 96%
“…The college has a culture that supports commercialization activities will have a higher level of commercialization and a higher level of activity as well as to university spin-offs 37 . Instead, the university culture which does not encourage commercialization activities will have less activity spin-offs.…”
Section: Model By Considering the Components Of Uso Establishmentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Towards this end, universities receive support in the form of research grants and support programmes. In the UK, for example, Higher Education Funding Council of England (HEFCE) allocates substantial funding for research based on the quality and cost of the research.As is evident from above, universities are expected to work collaboratively within the wider society (Carnoy, ) and use innovative research to start up new ventures and generate employment (Laukkanen, ), thereby contributing to overall economic development (Laukkanen, ; Wu, ). Organisational Culture: The changes mentioned above are implemented under the shadow of an entrepreneurial culture (Jacob, Lundqvist, & Hellsmark, ; Sporn, ) involving significant change in the management styles at universities (Dill & Sporn, ; Grigg, ; O'Shea et al , ). Closer integration of the independent units (Clark, ; Dill & Sporn, ), goal alignment of both administrators and faculty members (Kotter & Heskett, ), customer orientation (Marginson, ; Ritzer, ) and leadership which endeavours, through continuous encouragement of individuals to try new ventures and create informal networks (Kotter & Heskett, ), spread learning of entrepreneurial initiatives across the organisation.…”
Section: Roadmap Adopted By Entrepreneurial Universitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%