2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.meegid.2008.05.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Detection of viable Mycobacterium leprae in soil samples: Insights into possible sources of transmission of leprosy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
52
0
8

Year Published

2009
2009
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 75 publications
(62 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
2
52
0
8
Order By: Relevance
“…In Bangladesh, up to 75% of patients do not report contact with leprosy patients and, in Malawi, southern Africa, this was true for 85% of all cases. Perhaps the presence of bacillus in the environment or in asymptomatic carriers may help to explain such cases (de Wit et al 1993, Fine et al 1997, Matsuoka et al 1999, Richardus et al 2005, Lavania et al 2008.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In Bangladesh, up to 75% of patients do not report contact with leprosy patients and, in Malawi, southern Africa, this was true for 85% of all cases. Perhaps the presence of bacillus in the environment or in asymptomatic carriers may help to explain such cases (de Wit et al 1993, Fine et al 1997, Matsuoka et al 1999, Richardus et al 2005, Lavania et al 2008.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…leprae has previously been identified in water, plants, in the soil of endemic areas and in wild animals such as one armadillo species (Dasypus novemcinctus), which even demonstrates specific skin lesions. A North American study demonstrated the transmission of leprosy among such animals, reporting a prevalence of up to 19% among armadillos from that region (Matsuoka et al 1999, Chakrabarty & Dastidar 2001, Paige et al 2002, Truman 2005, Deps et al 2008, Lavania et al 2008.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, it reveals that the M. leprae genotype present in the collected water samples is the same as that found in the lesions of leprosy patients. Previous studies with environmental samples have also shown the presence of M. leprae DNA with varying positivity percentages: from 24 to 47.7% in water 8,15 ; 33.3%, 34.3%, and 37.5% in soil samples from the peridomicile of leprosy patients 9,10,16 ; and 21% in armadillos from endemic regions in Ceará 17 . CDERM: Dona Libânia National Reference Centre for Sanitary Dermatology; IRR: incidence rate ratio; CI: confidence interval; SNP: single-nucleotide polymorphism.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…The standard curve was generated using a ten-fold dilution series (ranging from 10 to 10 9 copies/reaction) of plasmid pIDTBlue16SrRNAMleprae (Integrated DNA Technologies, Inc., San Diego, USA), which contains a 171-bp fragment of the M. leprae 16S ribosomal ribonucleic acid (rRNA) gene 10 . Other mycobacteria species and non-mycobacterial (Mycobacterium tuberculosis H37Rv, Mycobacterium sp., Streptococcus pneumoniae ATCC 49619, Staphylococcus aureus, and Escherichia coli) were also included as controls.…”
Section: Quantitative Polymerase Chain Reactionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation