2009
DOI: 10.1093/jac/dkp378
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Detection of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus ST398 in food samples of animal origin in Spain

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
54
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 107 publications
(59 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
4
54
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The isolation of MRSA from different meat samples was reported previously from different countries (16)(17)(18)(19)(20)(21)(22)(23). Another study (10) reported MRSA strains from poultries in Iran; therefore, the isolation of MRSA strains from chicken meat was not surprising.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…The isolation of MRSA from different meat samples was reported previously from different countries (16)(17)(18)(19)(20)(21)(22)(23). Another study (10) reported MRSA strains from poultries in Iran; therefore, the isolation of MRSA strains from chicken meat was not surprising.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…(Anonymous 2005), there is a lack of information relating to antibiotic susceptibility of the isolated strains. According to other studies (Normanno et al 2007;de Boer et al 2009;Lozano et al 2009), the majority of the examined strains of MRSA were isolated from raw foods which, if properly processed and prepared before consumption, is not likely to cause disease. However, there is generally a shortage of data concerning the presence of MRSA in RTE foods.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lozano et al (2009) detected MRSA ST398 in food samples in Spain. A total of 318 samples of raw food were evaluated from food-producing animals (148 from chicken, 55 from pork, 46 from veal, 19 from lamb, 10 from turkey, 8 from rabbit and 12 minced-meat samples) and of wild animals (8 game birds, 4 wild boar, 4 deer and 4 hare samples).…”
Section: Products Of Animal Originmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…MRSA detection in animals has been performed, generally, with isolation from samples from nasal and oral mucosae and perineum in small animals (Loeffler et al, 2005;Nienhoff et al, 2009), samples from milk in cows (Kwon et al, 2005), samples from nasal, oral and/or perineal swab, in pigs and horses (Baptiste et al, 2005;Voss et al, 2005;Huijsdens et al, 2006), samples from nose and cloacae in poultries (Nemati et al, 2008) and samples from meats (Lozano et al, 2009). …”
Section: Mrsa Detection In Animalsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation