2018
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4939-8666-8_9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Detection of CNVs in NGS Data Using VS-CNV

Abstract: Copy number variations have been linked to numerous genetic diseases including cancer, Parkinson's disease, pancreatitis, and lupus. While current best practices for CNV detection often require using microarrays for detecting large CNVs or multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) for gene-sized CNVs, new methods have been developed with the goal of replacing both of these specialized assays with bioinformatic analysis applied to next-generation sequencing (NGS) data. Because NGS is already used … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Copy number variations (CNV) were detected using VarSeq™ v2.1 (VS‐CNV), which analyzes changes in WES coverage between the sample and controls (Fortier et al, 2018 ), and the detected CNVs were visually evaluated using GenomeBrowse® (Golden Helix, Inc.; Golden Helix, 2018a , 2018b ). Homozygous or heterozygous deletions were filtered based on p‐values (< 0.001) and annotated using ClinVar (Landrum et al, 2018 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Copy number variations (CNV) were detected using VarSeq™ v2.1 (VS‐CNV), which analyzes changes in WES coverage between the sample and controls (Fortier et al, 2018 ), and the detected CNVs were visually evaluated using GenomeBrowse® (Golden Helix, Inc.; Golden Helix, 2018a , 2018b ). Homozygous or heterozygous deletions were filtered based on p‐values (< 0.001) and annotated using ClinVar (Landrum et al, 2018 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are several programs to identify CNV from NGS data. However, there was no difference in detection when compared with the eXome Hidden Markov Model, which is the one typically used (data not shown) . In CES, the genes to be examined are limited; therefore, it is possible that there are CNV that could not be detected.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…HNF1B copy number loss were called from a referenced-based CLAMMS algorithm using exome sequencing (24), and confirmed by Illumina chip array. Samples underwent quality assurance including removal of samples of sex mismatch, other large chromosomal abnormalities, and outliers of derivative log ratio spread (DLRS) and genomic wave factors (25). Outliers were defined as 1.5 times the interquartile range (IQR) from the third quartile of the distribution of DLRS.…”
Section: Variant Annotation and Classificationmentioning
confidence: 99%