2019
DOI: 10.1101/2019.12.18.866830
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Detection of aberrant splicing events in RNA-seq data with FRASER

Abstract: 12Aberrant splicing is a major cause of rare diseases, yet its prediction from genome 13 sequence remains in most cases inconclusive. Recently, RNA sequencing has proven to 14 be an effective complementary avenue to detect aberrant splicing. Here, we developed 15 FRASER, an algorithm to detect aberrant splicing from RNA sequencing data. Unlike 16 existing methods, FRASER captures not only alternative splicing but also intron retention 17 events. This typically doubles the number of detected aberrant events and… Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

5
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This workflow analyzes RNA-seq datasets to identify genes with aberrant expression levels using OUTRIDER (44), and aberrant splicing using FRASER (45), amongst a large group of samples, while automatically controlling for latent confounders. To minimize tissue-specific differences, we processed the data from fibroblasts and whole blood separately, yielding >100 cases from each tissue, which was well above the recommended minimum of 50-60 samples to maximize outlier sensitivity (43).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This workflow analyzes RNA-seq datasets to identify genes with aberrant expression levels using OUTRIDER (44), and aberrant splicing using FRASER (45), amongst a large group of samples, while automatically controlling for latent confounders. To minimize tissue-specific differences, we processed the data from fibroblasts and whole blood separately, yielding >100 cases from each tissue, which was well above the recommended minimum of 50-60 samples to maximize outlier sensitivity (43).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The output of the DROP expression module is a list of outlier genes in each sample along with statistical information such as multiple-testing adjusted p-values, Z-scores, and foldchanges for each deviation compared to the cohort. We identified outlier genes with large under or overexpression in each sample at a false discovery rate (FDR) of 0.05 per OUTRIDER recommendations (44). The splicing module similarly provides relevant statistics and frequency of each abnormal splicing event within the dataset.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To identify genes with aberrant RNA expression, we performed three outlier analyses, i) aberrant expression levels, ii) aberrant splicing, and iii) monoallelic expression of rare variants via the DROP pipeline (Yépez et al, 2021). To identify aberrant protein expression, we developed the algorithm PROTRIDER which estimates deviations from expected protein is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in (which was not certified by peer review) preprint…”
Section: Manuscriptmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From genes associated with autism/ID and epilepsy to (DROP) using the default, recommended settings (43). This workflow analyzes RNA-seq data sets to identify genes with aberrant expression levels using OUTRIDER (44), and aberrant splicing using FRASER (45), among a large group of samples, while automatically controlling for latent confounders. To minimize tissue-specific differences, we processed the data from skin fibroblasts and whole blood separately, yielding more than 100 cases from each tissue, which was well above the recommended minimum of 50-60 samples to maximize outlier sensitivity (43).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The splicing module similarly provides relevant statistics and frequency of each abnormal splicing event within the data set. Theorizing that rare splicing events are more likely to be pathogenic, we focused on potentially novel splicing events that were seen no more than 2 times in their respective tissue using established FRASER statistical cutoffs (45).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%