1985
DOI: 10.1016/0014-5793(85)81260-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Detection and differentiation of cellulase components using low molecular mass fluorogenic substrates

Abstract: The 4-methylumbelliferyl /I-D-glycosides of glucose, cellobiose, cellotriose and lactose are used to differentiate several exo-cellobiohydrolase, endocellulase and /I-glucosidase activities in crude cellulase from Trichoderma reesei. Spectrophotometric or fluorimetric assays allow simple detection and quantitative measurements of eluate activities from ion-exchange chromatography and after analytical gel electrofocusing. Using the fluoropho~c glucoside several /?-glucosidases can be visual&d after isoelectric … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
44
0
1

Year Published

1988
1988
2006
2006

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 96 publications
(49 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
4
44
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…From our previous work on the bifunctional organisation of CBH I [8], it becomes clear that the modification with WRK is directed against the catalytic domain present in the core fragment and not against the cellulose-binding region (BA glycopeptide domain) which is seemingly left intact. An enzyme sample with 40070 residual activity is bound in approximately the same amount onto an affinity column carrying p-aminobenzyl 1-thio cellobioside as ligand and the retained fraction is completely desorbed by lactose [16]. This proves the homogeneity of the modified enzyme preparations and again the active site-directed character of the modification.…”
Section: Properties Of the Modified Enzymementioning
confidence: 68%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…From our previous work on the bifunctional organisation of CBH I [8], it becomes clear that the modification with WRK is directed against the catalytic domain present in the core fragment and not against the cellulose-binding region (BA glycopeptide domain) which is seemingly left intact. An enzyme sample with 40070 residual activity is bound in approximately the same amount onto an affinity column carrying p-aminobenzyl 1-thio cellobioside as ligand and the retained fraction is completely desorbed by lactose [16]. This proves the homogeneity of the modified enzyme preparations and again the active site-directed character of the modification.…”
Section: Properties Of the Modified Enzymementioning
confidence: 68%
“…Knowles, VTT, Espoo, Finland) by affinity chromatography [16]. Core I protein was obtained by papaln digestion and purified as previously described [8].…”
Section: Enzymes and Enzymic Assaysmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One unit of CDH was defined as the amount of the enzyme that reduced 1 mmol of DCPIP min À1 ml À1 . Degradation of 4-methylumbelliferyl--cellobioside (4-MUC) 28) was determined with glucono-1,5-lactone 29) at pH 5.0. -Glucosidase activity was determined with 4-methylumbelliferyl--glucoside (4-MUG) at pH 5.0.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The amounts of 4-methylumbelliferon (4-MU) were measured by fluorescence. 28) One unit of 4-MUC degrading activity and -Glucosidase was defined as the amount of the enzyme that released 1 mmol of 4-MU min À1 ml À1 from 4-MUC and 4-MUG respectively. CMCase activity was determined by release of reducing sugars 30) from carboxymethylcellulose (CMC, 1.0% [w/v]) at pH 5.0 for 30 min at 40 C. Avicelase activity was determined by release of reducing sugars 30) from Avicel Ò SF (Asahi Kasei, Osaka, Japan, 1.0% [w/v]) at pH 5.0 for 2 h at 40 C. One unit of Avicelase and CMCase was defined as the amount of the enzyme which released 1 mmol of reducing sugars min À1 ml À1 from Avicel Ò SF and CMC respectively.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mixtures of isoenzymes were obtained and were further fractionated by ion-exchange chromatography [7]. The homogeneity was tested both by SDS-PAGE and IEF-PAG [19]. The PI 3.9 (CBH I) and PI 5.9 component (CBH 11) were used in most of the experiments, but the results with isoenzyme mixtures were essentially identical.…”
Section: Enzyme Purificationmentioning
confidence: 99%