2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.optmat.2012.02.042
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Detecting platform for phenolic compounds–characteristic of enzymatic electrode

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Because of the fact that the selenophene‐based polymers are less conductive in comparison to thiophene/ethylenedioxythiophene‐based macrostructures, the capacitive current is observed in diagram on Figure 8. This phenomenon was not observed in case of tyrosinase immobilized in conducting film built of co‐polymer based on bis(ethylenedioxythiohene)diphenylamine 36 reported by us earlier. Despite the fact, selenophene‐based polymers are known because of their high charge mobility and good solubility in organic solvents as well as good film‐forming properties 8 what is a significant benefit in biosensor modification.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 59%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Because of the fact that the selenophene‐based polymers are less conductive in comparison to thiophene/ethylenedioxythiophene‐based macrostructures, the capacitive current is observed in diagram on Figure 8. This phenomenon was not observed in case of tyrosinase immobilized in conducting film built of co‐polymer based on bis(ethylenedioxythiohene)diphenylamine 36 reported by us earlier. Despite the fact, selenophene‐based polymers are known because of their high charge mobility and good solubility in organic solvents as well as good film‐forming properties 8 what is a significant benefit in biosensor modification.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 59%
“…Despite the fact, selenophene‐based polymers are known because of their high charge mobility and good solubility in organic solvents as well as good film‐forming properties 8 what is a significant benefit in biosensor modification. Moreover, the stability of the presented biosensor is more effective than reported in 36 (95 % retained after 3 month) whereas the value of the limit of detection was comparable.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 61%
“…This type of nanostructures contains graphene [10,11], nanoparticles (i.e. silver) [12], nanotubes [13], nanonofibers [14], nanorods [15] and thin molecular layers [6][7][8][9].…”
Section: Nanostructuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This type of materials can be designed by different molecular ways, i.e. Langmuir-Blodgett (LB) -type techniques [6,7], SAMs or LbL as well as electrolytic deposition [8,9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such model molecular assemblies can be prepared by Langmuir-Blodgett (LB) and Langmuir-Schaefer (LS) techniques [2,3], layer-by-layer (LbL) or by employing self-assembly monolayers (SAMs) or electrolytic deposition ( Fig. 1) [4,5]. The main advantage of using thin films to build a biosensor is the possibility to decrease dramatically the response time of the device.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%