2019 IEEE Winter Conference on Applications of Computer Vision (WACV) 2019
DOI: 10.1109/wacv.2019.00212
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Detecting Abnormal Events in Video Using Narrowed Normality Clusters

Abstract: We formulate the abnormal event detection problem as an outlier detection task and we propose a two-stage algorithm based on k-means clustering and one-class Support Vector Machines (SVM) to eliminate outliers. In the feature extraction stage, we propose to augment spatio-temporal cubes with deep appearance features extracted from the last convolutional layer of a pre-trained neural network. After extracting motion and appearance features from the training video containing only normal events, we apply k-means … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
48
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 85 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
1
48
1
Order By: Relevance
“…We can clearly see that the marked clusters are farthest from both normal distribution means, indicating that the containing points are indeed outliers. This assumption is also supported by the results obtained by Ionescu et al [59] in abnormal event detection in video, as they employ the same approach (based on k-means) to remove clusters of outlier motion and appearance samples. Nevertheless, our aim is to test out this assumption by quantifying the performance improvement of ShotgunWSD 2.0 over its previous version.…”
Section: ) Sense Embeddings After Outlier Removalsupporting
confidence: 59%
“…We can clearly see that the marked clusters are farthest from both normal distribution means, indicating that the containing points are indeed outliers. This assumption is also supported by the results obtained by Ionescu et al [59] in abnormal event detection in video, as they employ the same approach (based on k-means) to remove clusters of outlier motion and appearance samples. Nevertheless, our aim is to test out this assumption by quantifying the performance improvement of ShotgunWSD 2.0 over its previous version.…”
Section: ) Sense Embeddings After Outlier Removalsupporting
confidence: 59%
“…As evaluation metric, we employ the area under the curve (AUC) computed with regard to ground-truth annotations at the frame-level. The frame-level AUC metric used in most previous works [6,7,13,14,21,22,23,24,25,34,36] considers a frame as being a correct detection, if it contains at least one abnormal pixel. We adopt the same framelevel AUC definition as these previous works.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Abnormal event detection is commonly formalized as an outlier detection task [2,5,6,9,14,15,18,23,25,26,29,36,37,38,39], in which the main approach is to learn a model of familiarity from training videos and label the de-tected outliers as abnormal. Several abnormal event detection approaches [5,6,9,23,29] learn a dictionary of atoms representing normal events during training, then label the events not represented in the dictionary as abnormal.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To organize a tight boundary to detect abnormal data, we come up with a second model refinement stage which can classify samples more precisely. Inspired by the one-class SVM which is proved to construct a tighter (or narrower) boundary gap [40], we adopt the one-class SVM to leave out the small percentage of samples who are mislabeled as normality in the first stage. To make more explicit explanation for its working principle, we visualize the tight frontier of one-class SVM on a peanut shape dataset in Figure 4.…”
Section: Proposed Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%