1993
DOI: 10.1103/physreve.48.1916
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Destruction of a first-order smectic-A→smectic-C*phase transition by dimensional crossover in free-standing films

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
26
0

Year Published

1995
1995
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 61 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…After preparation, the films, which showed initially domains of different thickness, were left to equilibrate (typically for about 30 min) until a homogeneous thickness was attained and any flow between the film and its meniscus came to rest. The film thickness was determined by measuring the reflection spectrum using a UV/VIS spectrometer (AvaSpec-2048-USB2, Avantes) [19].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After preparation, the films, which showed initially domains of different thickness, were left to equilibrate (typically for about 30 min) until a homogeneous thickness was attained and any flow between the film and its meniscus came to rest. The film thickness was determined by measuring the reflection spectrum using a UV/VIS spectrometer (AvaSpec-2048-USB2, Avantes) [19].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We omitted θ 1 and θ N in <θ * >, because these surface values depend on b only through the coupling from θ 2 and θ N −1 , respectively, in the present model of Eq. (6). In practice, a remarkable deviation of the effective field, which is due to θ 1 , near the surface from the bulk relation (5) is observed in Fig.…”
Section: Results Of Numerical Analysismentioning
confidence: 78%
“…On the other hand, at a freely suspended film of C7 without the field, the jump also becomes small as a thickness of the film decreases, and eventually a critical thickness exists like the critical field in the bulk [5]. This effect due to surface layers has been confirmed at another materials [6]. A similarity and dissimilarity of effects of the external field and the surface layers are of interest [7,8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…αHM L d 2N A ρ L k B T ), the second term in the denominator of (33) can be neglected and (27) is recovered. In that limit, the term (2D/d) in (31) can be dropped and n 1,2 are identical to the equilibrium values given by (25) and (26).…”
Section: Molecular Model For Thin Filmsmentioning
confidence: 88%