2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2021.10.030
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Design parameters of polylactic acid custom trays manufactured by fused deposition modeling for partial edentulism: Consideration of the accuracy of the definitive cast

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Limitations of the review include the heterogeneity of the results, as the selected articles used PLA in different printing methods and in different quantitative analyses, because few used the DLP (Park et al, 2020) and SLA (Park et al, 2020) compared to FFF (Lo Russo et al, 2021Cresswell-Boyes et al, 2018;Nagata et al, 2022;Charasseangpaisarn et al, 2022;Deng et al 2018;Ishida, Miura, Shinya, 2022;Riva et al, 2022), so that the results may tend towards a conclusion that PLA presents better properties when associated with a printing method than another. Another limitation is that there are in vitro studies (Park et al, 2020;Ye et a., 2021;Lo Russo et al, 2021;Liu et al, 2022;Park, Shin, 2018;Hong et al, 2021) and that two articles selected (Deng et al, 2018;Peng et al, 2018) by the database could not be included in the present review due to the inability to access the full reading of the texts in full. Furthermore, the selection bias of the different types of objects used in the studies shows the difficulty in comparing certain properties in different objects analyzed, so that direct comparison between the methods used is not possible.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Limitations of the review include the heterogeneity of the results, as the selected articles used PLA in different printing methods and in different quantitative analyses, because few used the DLP (Park et al, 2020) and SLA (Park et al, 2020) compared to FFF (Lo Russo et al, 2021Cresswell-Boyes et al, 2018;Nagata et al, 2022;Charasseangpaisarn et al, 2022;Deng et al 2018;Ishida, Miura, Shinya, 2022;Riva et al, 2022), so that the results may tend towards a conclusion that PLA presents better properties when associated with a printing method than another. Another limitation is that there are in vitro studies (Park et al, 2020;Ye et a., 2021;Lo Russo et al, 2021;Liu et al, 2022;Park, Shin, 2018;Hong et al, 2021) and that two articles selected (Deng et al, 2018;Peng et al, 2018) by the database could not be included in the present review due to the inability to access the full reading of the texts in full. Furthermore, the selection bias of the different types of objects used in the studies shows the difficulty in comparing certain properties in different objects analyzed, so that direct comparison between the methods used is not possible.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, it is important that more research and studies are carried out and a greater number of articles are written so that future projects can clarify and highlight the importance of the clinical use of PLA and its advantageous properties in the various selected printing methods, in order to enable your job. It is also necessary to develop more in vivo studies on the topic of this systematic review, since the oral cavity cannot be fully simulated in in vitro studies as carried out in some articles included here (Park et al, 2020;Ye et al, 2021;Lo Russo et al, 2021;Liu et al, 2022;Park, Shin, 2018;Hong et al, 2021).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This semi-crystalline thermoplastic bio-sourced polymer has gained popularity because of its biocompatibility and biodegradability [21]. Moreover, studies have shown that PLA polymer offers acceptable mechanical properties in some dental applications and meets the requirement of the International Organization for Standardization (ISO) 20795-1 standards [22]. This polymer is frequently employed as a biomaterial for medical and dental applications [23].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%