“…Limitations of the review include the heterogeneity of the results, as the selected articles used PLA in different printing methods and in different quantitative analyses, because few used the DLP (Park et al, 2020) and SLA (Park et al, 2020) compared to FFF (Lo Russo et al, 2021Cresswell-Boyes et al, 2018;Nagata et al, 2022;Charasseangpaisarn et al, 2022;Deng et al 2018;Ishida, Miura, Shinya, 2022;Riva et al, 2022), so that the results may tend towards a conclusion that PLA presents better properties when associated with a printing method than another. Another limitation is that there are in vitro studies (Park et al, 2020;Ye et a., 2021;Lo Russo et al, 2021;Liu et al, 2022;Park, Shin, 2018;Hong et al, 2021) and that two articles selected (Deng et al, 2018;Peng et al, 2018) by the database could not be included in the present review due to the inability to access the full reading of the texts in full. Furthermore, the selection bias of the different types of objects used in the studies shows the difficulty in comparing certain properties in different objects analyzed, so that direct comparison between the methods used is not possible.…”