2022
DOI: 10.1109/tap.2022.3140523
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Design of Aperture-Multiplexing Metasurfaces via Back-Propagation Neural Network: Independent Control of Orthogonally-Polarized Waves

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
26
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…1) compared with [12], [13], [18], [19], we establish a mapping from EM constraints to the topology candidates to enable auto-selection of the suitable topology, which can be accomplished without experienced designers; 2) one advantage over [20]- [22] is that we establish a cross-evolution system to customize the topology and evolve it into an optimal design instead of building a dictionary mapping in advance through tedious training, hence we take only hundreds of simulation cycles while they took tens of thousands of simulation cycles to collect data; 3) the other advantage is, unlike [20]- [22] that obtained the optimal design by optimizing several candidate geometries, the auto-evolution system can evolve the auto-selected topology into new geometries that satisfy various constraints, thanks to the proposed fan-based representation defined by only tens of parameters instead of the pixelated metal layer defined by hundreds of parameters [20]. We validate the proposed framework in four cases where different EM constraints were provided.…”
Section: Auto-selection On Topology Auto-evolutionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…1) compared with [12], [13], [18], [19], we establish a mapping from EM constraints to the topology candidates to enable auto-selection of the suitable topology, which can be accomplished without experienced designers; 2) one advantage over [20]- [22] is that we establish a cross-evolution system to customize the topology and evolve it into an optimal design instead of building a dictionary mapping in advance through tedious training, hence we take only hundreds of simulation cycles while they took tens of thousands of simulation cycles to collect data; 3) the other advantage is, unlike [20]- [22] that obtained the optimal design by optimizing several candidate geometries, the auto-evolution system can evolve the auto-selected topology into new geometries that satisfy various constraints, thanks to the proposed fan-based representation defined by only tens of parameters instead of the pixelated metal layer defined by hundreds of parameters [20]. We validate the proposed framework in four cases where different EM constraints were provided.…”
Section: Auto-selection On Topology Auto-evolutionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fanbased representation reaches a balance between increasing possibilities and reducing complexity. Unlike the traditional method [18] that swept the parameters of a specific geometry, fan-based representation creates new geometries and provides more possibilities and functionalities. Compared with [19] that pixelated the metal layer and involved hundreds of parameters, fan-based representation creates sufficient structures by utilizing only tens of parameters, hence training complexity and the amount of training data are reduced significantly.…”
Section: B Auto-evolutionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations