2019
DOI: 10.1017/dsi.2019.75
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Design of a Custom-Made Cranial Implant in Patients Suffering from Apert Syndrome

Abstract: This study defines a methodological procedure for the design and manufacturing of a prosthetic implant for the reconstruction of a midsagittal bony-deficiency of the skull due to the Apert congenital disorder. Conventional techniques for craniofacial defects reconstruction rely on the mirrored-image technique. When the cranial lesion extends over the midline or in case of bilateral defects, other approaches based on thin plate spline interpolation or constrained anatomical deformation are applied.The proposed … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 15 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is one of the most challenging surgical procedures owing to the complication of the skull’s form and the differences in the physiology of the skull. The very first phase in addressing cranial problems is to detach abnormally connected skull bones and replace them with accurate implants in order to restore their functionality [ 2 ]. According to Park et al [ 3 ], customized implants for skull skeletal augmentation should be fitted properly to the cranial deficiency, reducing the gap between the implant and the bone, as well as matching the tapered borders with the neighboring bone boundaries.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is one of the most challenging surgical procedures owing to the complication of the skull’s form and the differences in the physiology of the skull. The very first phase in addressing cranial problems is to detach abnormally connected skull bones and replace them with accurate implants in order to restore their functionality [ 2 ]. According to Park et al [ 3 ], customized implants for skull skeletal augmentation should be fitted properly to the cranial deficiency, reducing the gap between the implant and the bone, as well as matching the tapered borders with the neighboring bone boundaries.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%