2005
DOI: 10.1016/s1322-7696(08)60478-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Design, format, validity and reliability of multiple choice questions for use in nursing research and education

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
129
0
6

Year Published

2010
2010
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 161 publications
(151 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
1
129
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…More distractors decrease the probability of this guess work, and increases reliability and validity. 28,29 At the same time, however, increasing the options increases the test-time. 29 Furthermore, good quality, wellconstructed distractors, does reduce cueing.…”
Section: Distractorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More distractors decrease the probability of this guess work, and increases reliability and validity. 28,29 At the same time, however, increasing the options increases the test-time. 29 Furthermore, good quality, wellconstructed distractors, does reduce cueing.…”
Section: Distractorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Open banks of exam questions are published in numerous countries and every student can become familiar with their contents and thus prepare for the final exam or mid-term test (Considine et al, 2005;Hansen & Dexter, 1997;Park & Yang, 2015;Yang et al, 2018). It needs to be noted, however, that open task banks usually contain a few thousand of items (e.g.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Following the changes that take place in psychometric properties of MCQs in consecutive sessions or test rounds, should give an opportunity of inclusion of defence mechanisms that would protect against the excessive use of questions and lowering the quality of assessment. Additional advantage of carrying out such control could be applying the results of test questions evaluation in the improvement of faulty or "overused" MCQs (Considine, Botti, & Thomas, 2005).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Reliability is the degree to which an instrument produces the same results with repeated administration (Beanland et al, 1999;Polit & Hungler, 1999;Considine et al, 2005). A high level of reliability is important when the effect of an intervention on knowledge is measured using a pre-test/post-test design.…”
Section: Validity Reliability and Pilotingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Concepts related to reliability are consistency, precision, stability, equivalence and internal consistency (Beanland et al, 1999). Regarding how to measure reliability; it can be measured using correlation coefficients or reliability coefficients (Beanland et al, 1999;Polit & Hungler, 1999;Considine et al, 2005). The data used for reliability and validity analysis in this study are typically obtained during a pilot study.…”
Section: Validity Reliability and Pilotingmentioning
confidence: 99%