2013
DOI: 10.1103/physrevstab.16.012004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Design evolution and properties of superconducting parallel-bar rf-dipole deflecting and crabbing cavities

Abstract: Deflecting/crabbing cavities serve a variety of purposes in different accelerator applications, primarily in separating a single beam into multiple beams and in rotating bunches for head-on collisions at the interaction point in particle colliders. Deflecting/crabbing cavities are also used for transverse and longitudinal emittance exchange in beams, x-ray pulse compression, and for beam diagnostics. Compact superconducting deflecting/crabbing cavities are under development due to strict dimensional constraint… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
25
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…High-Luminosity LHC employs two sets of crab cavities, each consisting of four cavities per IP and per beam: one set with the crossing in the horizontal and the other -in the vertical plane. Currently, there are two different designs of the crab cavities being considered: Double Quarter Wave (DQW) [18] and RF Dipole (RFD) [19][20][21][22]. Both designs feature a large number of high order modes, some of which might be dangerous for the coupled-bunch stability.…”
Section: Crab Homs For Hl-lhcmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…High-Luminosity LHC employs two sets of crab cavities, each consisting of four cavities per IP and per beam: one set with the crossing in the horizontal and the other -in the vertical plane. Currently, there are two different designs of the crab cavities being considered: Double Quarter Wave (DQW) [18] and RF Dipole (RFD) [19][20][21][22]. Both designs feature a large number of high order modes, some of which might be dangerous for the coupled-bunch stability.…”
Section: Crab Homs For Hl-lhcmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This requirement follows from the LHC specifications of a rf frequency equal to 400 MHz while the distance between the two beam pipes at the foreseen cavity locations is about 194 mm [3]. Three designs have been evaluated, fabricated, and rf tested so far: (i) The double quarter wave crab cavity (DQWCC) developed at BNL in Upton, New York, USA [4,5], which will be used for the above mentioned proof-of-principle test [6], (ii) the rf dipole crab cavity (RFDCC) developed in collaboration between the Old Dominion University (ODU) in Norfolk, Virginia, USA and SLAC National Laboratory in Menlo Park, California, USA [7], and (iii) the four-rod UK crab cavity (4RCC) developed at the Lancaster University in Bailrigg, Lancaster, UK in collaboration with the Cockcroft Institute in Daresbury, Warrington, UK [8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The crabbing system of HL-LHC will follow the local scheme [1]. The IP1 will be equipped with a set of Double-Quarter Wave (DQW) cavities [2] while IP5 will have a set of RF Dipole (RFD) cavities [3]. The four-rod crab cavity [4] was also considered for the HL-LHC crabbing system and then downselected in favor of the DQW and RFD cavities.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%