2009
DOI: 10.1021/ic8017387
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Design Considerations for a System for Photocatalytic Hydrogen Production from Water Employing Mixed-Metal Photochemical Molecular Devices for Photoinitiated Electron Collection

Abstract: Supramolecular complexes coupling Ru(II) or Os(II) polyazine light absorbers through bridging ligands to Rh(III) or Ir(III) allow the study of factors impacting photoinitiated electron collection and multielectron water reduction to produce hydrogen. The [{(bpy)(2)Ru(dpb)}(2)IrCl(2)](PF(6))(5) system represents the first photoinitiated electron collector in a molecular system (bpy = 2,2'-bipyridine, dpb = 2,3-bis(2-pyridyl)benzoquinoxaline). The [{(bpy)(2)Ru(dpp)}(2)RhCl(2)](PF(6))(5) system represents the fir… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
81
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 97 publications
(83 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
2
81
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Second, a nonconjugated bridging ligand should be used because a conjugated system in the bridge ligand lowers the reducing power of the catalyst unit (9). The efficiencies and the stability of these supramolecular photocatalysts (Φ CO ¼ 0.12-0.15, TON CO ∼ 200) are much greater than those of the other reported supramolecular-type photocatalysts for both CO 2 reduction (13-16) and H 2 evolution (16)(17)(18)(19). We sought to apply this architecture to construct unique supramolecular photocatalysts for the reduction of CO 2 to selectively form formic acid (which has not been reported to date).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Second, a nonconjugated bridging ligand should be used because a conjugated system in the bridge ligand lowers the reducing power of the catalyst unit (9). The efficiencies and the stability of these supramolecular photocatalysts (Φ CO ¼ 0.12-0.15, TON CO ∼ 200) are much greater than those of the other reported supramolecular-type photocatalysts for both CO 2 reduction (13-16) and H 2 evolution (16)(17)(18)(19). We sought to apply this architecture to construct unique supramolecular photocatalysts for the reduction of CO 2 to selectively form formic acid (which has not been reported to date).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[13][14][15] The bridging ligand between Ru and Rh metals in this case was 2,3-bis(2-pyridyl)pyrazine (dpp) to result in the [(bpy) 2 Ru(dpp)BrRhBr(dpp) Ru(bpy) 2 ] 5+ molecular construct shown in Fig. 1b.…”
Section: A Few Specific Case Studies Of Photoinduced Charge Accumulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Electrochemically the trimetallic complexes of the general formula [{(TL) 2 3+ shows irreversible Rh III/II/I reductions at −0.51 and −0.55 V vs SCE (M, Ru or Os), respectively, followed by dpp 0/− couples for each dpp. 42 The lower cationic charge and the presence of more electron-rich TLs in the tpy-based systems shifts the Rh III/II/I reduction to more negative potentials. The electrochemistry of the trimetallic supramolecular complexes predicts an Ru(dπ)-or Os(dπ)-HOMO with energy tuned by the TL or LA metal and an Rh(dσ * )-based LUMO with energy tuned by the halides.…”
Section: Rhodium-based Supramolecular Photocatalysts: Redox Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…42 A thermodynamically favorable driving force for reductive quenching of the 3 MLCT state by DMA exists for [{(bpy) 2 Ru(dpb)} 2 IrCl 2 ] 5+ , as the excited state reduction potential of the 3 MLCT is 1.13 V vs SCE. This iridium-based complex is not a photocatalyst under the conditions studied for the other systems.…”
Section: 67mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation