2010
DOI: 10.1115/1.4000851
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Design and Validation of a General Purpose Robotic Testing System for Musculoskeletal Applications

Abstract: Orthopaedic research on in vitro forces applied to bones, tendons, and ligaments during joint loading has been difficult to perform because of limitations with existing robotic simulators in applying

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
53
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(55 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
53
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Further biomechanical studies are needed to more definitively assess the remplissage procedure. Employing advanced techniques such as in vivo kinematic tracking 39 , robotic devices 40,41 and finite element analysis 42 may be useful. Specifically, in vivo studies would provide better direct evidence regarding the advantages and adverse effects of surgical procedures.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further biomechanical studies are needed to more definitively assess the remplissage procedure. Employing advanced techniques such as in vivo kinematic tracking 39 , robotic devices 40,41 and finite element analysis 42 may be useful. Specifically, in vivo studies would provide better direct evidence regarding the advantages and adverse effects of surgical procedures.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since the first publication on in vitro gait simulation [1], each group has focused on improving several aspects of the existing approaches, being mainly the limited degrees of freedom of the mechanism controlling the kinematics of the tibia, the low gait speed, the limited forces applied to the tendons and the limited ground reaction force magnitudes. In the most recent simulators most of these targeted improvements were achieved [6,7], thereby improving the validity of simulation results and their relevance for clinical practice. However, some drawbacks remain.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…the forces applied to the tendons, ground reaction forces and tibial kinematics. Therefore, in vitro experimentation still relies to a large extent on arbitrary and manual tuning of the control 6 inputs, and observer-dependent evaluation of the simulation results. This inevitably undermines standardization of the simulation procedure and potentially limits the reproducibility of the simulator performance over different specimens.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In addition the GRF that the prosthetic device produces is a result of its overall dynamic performance and matching the GRF resulting from the leg prosthesis to the GRF of that produced by an able body dose not seem to be a reasonable method to test the prosthesis. Noble et al [4] have taken a similar approach and used iterative optimization to adjust the joint motion trajectory profiles to eliminate offsets between the actual and target load responses.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%