2008
DOI: 10.1089/ten.tea.2006.0418
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Design and Fabrication of 3D Porous Scaffolds to Facilitate Cell-Based Gene Therapy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
8
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 69 publications
3
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, cell attachment and viability were enhanced in 3D macro/ microporous PLLA scaffolds after the incorporation of porogen (30% salt), which improved surface topography (Figure 4(a) vs. Figure 4(b)). This observation is in agreement with other studies showing that cartilaginous tissue formation was reported in scaffolds with smaller pore size of 174 mm and 115-335 mm [22][23][24]. Furthermore, a study by Grad et al [25] has shown that a decrease in pore size might help to maintain the appropriate phenotype expression of the seeded chondrocytes and that cells are more likely to dedifferentiate when cultured in a 3D-scaffold with large pore sizes (30 times the cell diameter, which is approximately 10-15 mm) [26,27].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 94%
“…Moreover, cell attachment and viability were enhanced in 3D macro/ microporous PLLA scaffolds after the incorporation of porogen (30% salt), which improved surface topography (Figure 4(a) vs. Figure 4(b)). This observation is in agreement with other studies showing that cartilaginous tissue formation was reported in scaffolds with smaller pore size of 174 mm and 115-335 mm [22][23][24]. Furthermore, a study by Grad et al [25] has shown that a decrease in pore size might help to maintain the appropriate phenotype expression of the seeded chondrocytes and that cells are more likely to dedifferentiate when cultured in a 3D-scaffold with large pore sizes (30 times the cell diameter, which is approximately 10-15 mm) [26,27].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 94%
“…As expected, the fibrous matrices had a high porosity about 93.5 ± 2.3%, providing NPS a great advantage when compared to the other methods as solid freeform fabrication (55–70%) and 3D weaving (∼74%) . Another distinguished feature of NPS is the high level of pore interconnectivity.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 57%
“…In addition, pore size, porosity, pore interconnectivity, scaffold surface area, and scaffold material are all critical factors that can influence chondrocyte biology . Ideally, the scaffold architecture should possess suitable mechanical properties and favorable pore structure to closely mimic the naturally texture …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Scaffolds made of collagen and HA with/without synthetic polymers have been widely produced by electrospinning (ES) [49][50][51][52] and conventional scaffold fabrication techniques [53][54][55][56][57]. The flexibility of generating broad pore size ranges and mechanical properties by additive manufacturing (AM) makes it a superior alternative to ES and conventional techniques [58][59][60][61]. Hence, this work investigated the mechanical properties of PLGA-nHA-collagen composite scaffolds produced by 3D bioplotting (3DBP) using HFP as a solvent.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%