2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.aap.2018.08.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Design and experiment verification of a novel analysis framework for recognition of driver injury patterns: From a multi-class classification perspective

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
8
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
3
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Likewise, our results agree with the studies that applied a non-parametric model analysis, where the concurrent variables that increase severity are alcohol and drug influence (psychophysical conditions) and the non-use of a safety belt, as shown in the references [26,28,29], especially in RO collision types [35] and in the case of an ROR collision [36]. Moreover, no factor alone is a key determinant; only a combination of factors are [26].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Likewise, our results agree with the studies that applied a non-parametric model analysis, where the concurrent variables that increase severity are alcohol and drug influence (psychophysical conditions) and the non-use of a safety belt, as shown in the references [26,28,29], especially in RO collision types [35] and in the case of an ROR collision [36]. Moreover, no factor alone is a key determinant; only a combination of factors are [26].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Among the non-traditional methods with two or multiple answer variables, there are the Artificial Neuronal Network (ANN) [26] and Classification And Regression Trees (CARTs) [27,28]. Similarly, other advanced tools have been combined, such as Machine Learning (ML) methods, including Conditional Inference Trees and Forest [29], Decision Trees (DT) and Decision rules (DR) [30][31][32], Random Forest (RF) and Boosted Regression Trees (BRTs) [33], RF and OPM models [34], CART (as a variable selection model) and Support Vector Machine (SVM) (as a predictive model) [35], RF for variable selection and ANN for prediction [36], and comparison ML methods and performance studies [37,38].…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost) and random forest were used to select the most effective independent variables. This is in line with recent related studies that deal with a high number of independent variables [27][28][29][30][31]. The random forest aggregates many binary decision trees.…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 86%
“…Then, the identified effective variables are used as selected variables to explore the effects of these selected variables on the predicted variable. Random forest is a common method for selecting the most effective variables in studies with a high number of predictors ( (Jahangiri, Rakha and Dingus, 2016); (Kitali, Alluri, Sando, Haule, Kidando and Lentz, 2018); (Zhu, Li and Wang, 2018); (Aghaabbasi, Shekari, Shah, Olakunle, Armaghani and Moeinaddini, 2020); (Lu and Ma, 2020)). The random forest aggregates many binary decision trees.…”
Section: Crash Typementioning
confidence: 99%