2019
DOI: 10.17224/energagric.2019v34n2p152-161
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Desempenho Operacional Do Conjunto Trator Semeadora Adubadora De Fluxo Contínuo Em Função Da Pressão De Inflação Dos Rodados E Velocidade De Deslocamento

Abstract: DESEMPENHO OPERACIONAL DO CONJUNTO TRATOR SEMEADORA ADUBADORA DE FLUXO CONTÍNUO EM FUNÇÃO DA PRESSÃO DE INFLAÇÃO DOS RODADOS E VELOCIDADE DE DESLOCAMENTO   MARCELO QUEIROZ AMORIM1, FRANCISCA EDCARLA DE ARAÚJO NICOLAU2, CLICE DE ARAÚJO MENDONÇA3, PAULO RICARDO ALVES DOS SANTOS4, CARLOS ALESSANDRO CHIODEROLI5   1Doutorando em Engenharia Agrícola, Departamento de Engenharia Agrícola, Universidade Federal do Ceará-UFC Bloco 804, s/n – Pici, cep:60455-760, Fortaleza - CE, Brasil. E-mail: mqu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 5 publications
0
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This is due to the tire's contact and adherence to the soil surface, which may be greater or lesser and may vary according to the inflation pressure used. However, the discussion is different from that described by Amorim et al (2019) when they tested a tractor-seeder set with two tire inflation pressures and did not find an operational speed variation. The result is possibly the consequence of the lower traction force required by the seed drill compared to the subsoiler.…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 64%
“…This is due to the tire's contact and adherence to the soil surface, which may be greater or lesser and may vary according to the inflation pressure used. However, the discussion is different from that described by Amorim et al (2019) when they tested a tractor-seeder set with two tire inflation pressures and did not find an operational speed variation. The result is possibly the consequence of the lower traction force required by the seed drill compared to the subsoiler.…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 64%