2011
DOI: 10.1590/s0006-87052011000200012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Desempenho de híbridos de milho em diferentes arranjos espaciais de plantas

Abstract: ResumoAs modificações introduzidas recentemente nos genótipos de milho tem tornado necessário reavaliar as recomendações de práticas de manejo para esta cultura, dentre elas, o arranjo espacial de plantas. Este trabalho foi realizado com o objetivo de verificar o melhor arranjo de plantas para os híbridos de milho XB 6010, XB 6012, XB 7253, XB 9003 e AG 9010 nos espaçamentos entre linhas de 0,45 e 0,90 m e nas populações de 50.000, 60.000, 70.000, 80.000 e 90.000 plantas ha -1. O experimento foi realizado em 2… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

4
30
2
30

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(66 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
4
30
2
30
Order By: Relevance
“…ANOVA error probability and coefficient of variation (CV) for the number of ears per plant (NEP), number of grains per ear (NGE), mass of 100 grains (MCG), aboveground dry matter productivity (MS), harvest index (HI), and grain productivity (Pgrains), for maize crops grown at different levels of irrigation and plant density. Kappes et al (2011), using the hybrids XB 6010, XB 6012, XB 7253, XB 9003, and AG 9010; densities between 5 and 9 plants per m -2 resulted in a gradual average change from 1.0 to 0.92 ears per plant -1 , respectively. According to Sangoi et al (2002), increasing plant density enhances the apical dominance of the tassel on the ear, suppressing female fertility.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…ANOVA error probability and coefficient of variation (CV) for the number of ears per plant (NEP), number of grains per ear (NGE), mass of 100 grains (MCG), aboveground dry matter productivity (MS), harvest index (HI), and grain productivity (Pgrains), for maize crops grown at different levels of irrigation and plant density. Kappes et al (2011), using the hybrids XB 6010, XB 6012, XB 7253, XB 9003, and AG 9010; densities between 5 and 9 plants per m -2 resulted in a gradual average change from 1.0 to 0.92 ears per plant -1 , respectively. According to Sangoi et al (2002), increasing plant density enhances the apical dominance of the tassel on the ear, suppressing female fertility.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The yield of maize grain is a complex variable that depends on the interaction between genetic, environmental, and management factors (KAPPES et al, 2011). There are several causes of a low crop yield, in particular insufficient availability of water and nutrients in the soil, incorrect soil management, and inappropriate sowing density (SILVA et al, 2003).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Conversely, in irregularly spaced crop systems, certain individuals stand out over the others in the same population and, consequently, the frequency of plants dominated by the higher intensity of intraspecific competition tends to increase, hampering the agronomic performance of the crop (Sangoi et al, 2012). Stalk diameter is important in the mechanical harvest, avoiding plant breaking and lodging due to thinner stalks (Kappes et al, 2011).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The spatial arrangement of corn plants varies depending on the spacing between rows and between plants in the row (Von Pinho, 2008;Kappes et al, 2011). Research shows that improving plant arrangement, in equidistant spacings, has contributed to decreasing competition between plants in the row and reducing soil water evaporation due to increased shading (Argenta, 2001).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nitrogen fertilization should consider the expected grain yield and soil organic matter content (Argenta, 2001), since nitrogen interferes positively on yield (Cancellier et al, 2011;Farinelli & Lemos, 2012) when other factors are not limiting. In southern Brazil (Ceretta, 2000) and in and in the whole country (Coelho, 2007), corn yield is limited by insufficient N fertilization to the extent that the increase in yield with increasing nitrogen rates is represented by the increase in the number and weight of grains and spike length (Kappes et al, 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%