Description and survey of methodologies for the determination of amorphous content via X-ray powder diffraction

Abstract

The presence of amorphous materials in crystalline samples is an increasingly important issue for diffractionists. Traditional phase quantification via the Rietveld method fails to take into account the occurrence of amorphous material in the sample and without careful attention on behalf of the operator its presence would remain undetected. Awareness of this issue is increasing in importance with the advent of nanotechnology and the blurring of the boundaries between amorphous and crystalline species. The methodology of a number of different approaches to the determination of amorphous content via X-ray diffraction and an assessment of their performance, is described. Laboratory-based, X-ray diffraction data from a suite of synthetic samples, with amorphous content rangäing from 0.0 to 50 wt%, has been analysed using both direct (in which the contribution of the amorphous component to the pattern is used to obtain an estimate of concentration) and indirect (where the absolute abundances of the crystalline components are used to estimate the amorphous content by difference) methodologies. In addition, both single peak and whole pattern methodologies have been assessed. All methods produce reasonable results, however the study highlights some of the strengths, deficiencies and applicability of each of the approaches.

Method for Direct Determination of Glassy Phase Dissolution in Hydrating Fly Ash‐Cement System Using X‐ray Diffraction

“…Phase quantification was done using the external standard method with NIST SRM 676a α‐Al 2 O 3 as the external standard. In the external standard method, the absolute weight fractions of known phases, w α are determined using the refined Rietveld scale factors of the individual phases and of an external standard …”

Influence of Temperature and Added Lime on the Glassy Phase Dissolution in Low-calcium Fly ash Binary Blend

“…A first order Chebyshev polynomial combined with a 1/2θ term was used to fit the background intensity before performing phase analysis Phase quantification was done using the external standard method with NIST SRM 676a α-Al 2 O 3 as the external standard. In the external standard method, the absolute weight fractions of known phases, w are determined using the refined Rietveld scale factors of the phases and of an external standard (Madsen and Scarlett 2011;Scarlett and Madsen 2006;O'Connor and Raven 1988).…”

Stacking disorder in silicon carbide supported cobalt crystallites: an X-ray diffraction, electron diffraction and high resolution electron microscopy study

“…The amorphous content of the catalyst prior to reduction was determined by addition of fluorite as an internal standard as described by Madsen et al 14 The presence of amorphous material in a β-SiC supported cobalt catalyst was described by Labuschagne et al…”