Descemet's Stripping Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty (DSAEK) Using Corneal Donor Tissue Not Acceptable for Use in Penetrating Keratoplasty as a Result of Anterior Stromal Scars, Pterygia, and Previous Corneal Refractive Surgical Procedures
Abstract:Postoperative results of DSAEK using donor tissue excluded from use in penetrating keratoplasty as a result of stromal flaws are equivalent to results using standard donor tissue. Central corneal thickness measurements should be performed before cutting to avoid tissue perforation. The use of ASF tissue for DSAEK will expand the cornea donor pool.
“…They compared the aggregate ASF donor tissue DSAEK results with a control DSAEK group and found no difference in visual acuity, topography, astigmatism, pachymetry, or ECD. Our reported visual acuity (20/25 to 20/40, excluding case 5) and ECD (loss of 33.1% in our series and 32% in the serious of Phillips et al 4 ) are very similar to the ASF donor tissue outcomes reported by Phillips et al 4 We found no difference in smoothness of the cap-cut surface in the number of frayed posterior collagen fibers in LASIK versus non-LASIK donor caps centrally and peripherally. The similarity in best spectacle-corrected visual acuity outcomes with the use of LASIK and PRK donor tissue as compared with normal donor tissue is likely a result of the smoothness of the prepared interface in the postrefractive surgery tissues.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…3,4 We report the first case of DSAEK using a PRK donor cornea and 6 cases of DSAEK using LASIK donor cornea along with histopathology of 3 LASIK donor caps from DSAEK microkeratome preparation.…”
We report the first case of DSAEK using PRK donor tissue, which was successful. Our experience with LASIK donor tissue was comparable to nonrefractive donor tissue with the exception of the persistent donor macrofolds in one patient.
“…They compared the aggregate ASF donor tissue DSAEK results with a control DSAEK group and found no difference in visual acuity, topography, astigmatism, pachymetry, or ECD. Our reported visual acuity (20/25 to 20/40, excluding case 5) and ECD (loss of 33.1% in our series and 32% in the serious of Phillips et al 4 ) are very similar to the ASF donor tissue outcomes reported by Phillips et al 4 We found no difference in smoothness of the cap-cut surface in the number of frayed posterior collagen fibers in LASIK versus non-LASIK donor caps centrally and peripherally. The similarity in best spectacle-corrected visual acuity outcomes with the use of LASIK and PRK donor tissue as compared with normal donor tissue is likely a result of the smoothness of the prepared interface in the postrefractive surgery tissues.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…3,4 We report the first case of DSAEK using a PRK donor cornea and 6 cases of DSAEK using LASIK donor cornea along with histopathology of 3 LASIK donor caps from DSAEK microkeratome preparation.…”
We report the first case of DSAEK using PRK donor tissue, which was successful. Our experience with LASIK donor tissue was comparable to nonrefractive donor tissue with the exception of the persistent donor macrofolds in one patient.
“…6 months there was no statistically significant difference in the best-corrected acuity, endothelial cell count, and topographic measurements of the surface regularity index and surface asymmetry index between cases and controls [11]. Khalifa et al reported their analysis of preparation of two corneal lenticules with prior RK, prepared with a microkeratome.…”
Section: Endothelial Transplants With Anterior Stromal Flawed Donorsmentioning
Corneas with a history of refractive surgery have found use in endothelial keratoplasty. Multiple objective methods of tissue identification have been investigated to avoid the use of these corneas in penetrating or anterior keratoplasty surgeries.
“…This potential is bolstered by the Eye Bank Association of America's (EBAA) 2005 decision to expand the criteria for acceptable tissue: [102] corneas that had been deemed unsuitable for PK because of anterior scarring, central pterygia, or corneal refractive surgeries such as radial keratotomy (RK) are now being effectively used in EK procedures [104,105]. It is therefore increasingly important that each donor cornea is evaluated both accurately and efficiently in order to make the best use of all available tissue.…”
Section: Optical Coherence Tomography In Eye Bankingmentioning
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.