2014
DOI: 10.5858/arpa.2014-0392-oa
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Depletion of Core Needle Biopsy Cellularity and DNA Content as a Result of Vigorous Touch Preparations

Abstract: Context.-Touch preparations (TP) of core needle biopsies (CNBs) are used at some institutions for on-site assessment of CNB adequacy. In our clinical practice, we have encountered instances in which TPs resulted in substantial depletion of CNB cellularity.Objective.-To examine the effect of increasingly vigorous TPs on cellularity and DNA content of CNBs.Design.-Ex vivo CNBs (n ¼ 56) were performed on resected lung and kidney tumor specimens. For each specimen, CNBs were performed in quadruplicate on tumor and… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
32
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In fact, the use of TPs from core biopsies of lung specimens can result in the deletion of cellularity and DNA content of the cores. 17 Because molecular analysis is vital to treatment in lung cancer, this study discourages the use of these preparations for subclassification of ADC and SqCC of the lung.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In fact, the use of TPs from core biopsies of lung specimens can result in the deletion of cellularity and DNA content of the cores. 17 Because molecular analysis is vital to treatment in lung cancer, this study discourages the use of these preparations for subclassification of ADC and SqCC of the lung.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The DNA content lost is directly related to each centimeter of imprint, thereby impacting the material available for molecular testing and other ancillary studies [11] . Rekhtman et al [12] described an imprint of a NCB as touching the CNB to the slide with minimal sliding along the slide surface and recommended the horizontal drag method. Other factors that can affect the quality and quantity of the NCB material include the type and location of the target lesion and the number and type of needle passes [12,13] .…”
Section: Nongynecologic Cytologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Rekhtman et al [12] described an imprint of a NCB as touching the CNB to the slide with minimal sliding along the slide surface and recommended the horizontal drag method. Other factors that can affect the quality and quantity of the NCB material include the type and location of the target lesion and the number and type of needle passes [12,13] . The shift to and preference for NCB over FNA is related to the ability of radiologists to provide multiple cores at the same time through the use of a coaxial NCB system and the flexibility for pathologists to triage the tissue adequately for ancillary studies including immunohistochemistry, histochemistry, microbiologic cultures, molecular studies, and flow cytometry [14,15] .…”
Section: Nongynecologic Cytologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The current approach of frozen section analysis (FSA) for in-procedure histopathology is relatively time-consuming and damaging to the tissue and is not feasible for the immediate evaluation of small needle core biopsies [1]. Touch preparation of these specimens is currently the most effective method, but can frequently misrepresent tumor content and often needs a specialized cytopathologist for proper interpretation [2]. The labor-intensiveness and destructiveness of traditional histopathology preparations, like formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded processing or frozen section analysis, is due to the need to deposit a thin section of hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) stained tissue on a slide to enable it to be evaluated by light-transmission microscopy.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%