2010 European Dependable Computing Conference 2010
DOI: 10.1109/edcc.2010.26
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dependability Analysis of Diffusion Protocols in Wireless Networks with Heterogeneous Node Capabilities

Abstract: Wireless networks are starting to be populated by interconnected devices that reveal remarkable hardware and software differences. This fact raises a number of questions on the applicability of available results on dependability-related aspects of communication protocols, since they were obtained for wireless networks with homogeneous nodes. In this work, we study the impact of heterogeneous communication and computation capabilities of nodes on dependability aspects of diffusion protocols for wireless network… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

2
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
(29 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Consumers and merchants use different channels, and we consider an exponential relation between the omission probability and the number of devices that use the channel. Taking into account recent works that analyse failure probability in heterogeneous scenarios, e.g., [18], we assume that the omission probability for consumers results in the interval …”
Section: A System Specificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consumers and merchants use different channels, and we consider an exponential relation between the omission probability and the number of devices that use the channel. Taking into account recent works that analyse failure probability in heterogeneous scenarios, e.g., [18], we assume that the omission probability for consumers results in the interval …”
Section: A System Specificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this section, we assess coverage in the case of omission failure of the multicast search received by the merchants (M[i].mSearch) and omission failure of the responses sent by the merchants (M[i].resp). Figure 7(b) shows the coverage profiles for different probability P rxResp of failures of resp; in the figure, the probability of failure of M[i].mSearch depends on the timeout value and is derived from the analysis results reported in [17]; e.g., for T 1 = 10, the probability of failure of M[i].mSearch is 0.87.…”
Section: State-based Stochastic Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%