2007
DOI: 10.1086/511772
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Densities of Solar System Objects from Their Rotational Light Curves

Abstract: We present models of the shapes of four Kuiper belt objects (KBOs) and Jovian Trojan (624) Hektor as ellipsoidal figures of equilibrium and Roche binaries. Our simulations select those figures of equilibrium whose lightcurves best match the measured rotational data. The best fit shapes, combined with the knowledge of the spin period of the objects provide estimates of the bulk densities of these objects. We find that the lightcurves of KBOs (20000) Varuna and 2003 EL 61 are well matched by Jacobi triaxial elli… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

5
137
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 131 publications
(148 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
5
137
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Even more interesting is that shape modeling has suggested a density higher than nearly anything else known in the Kuiper belt and consistent with a body almost thoroughly dominated by rock (Rabinowitz et al 2006;Lacerda et al 2008;Lellouch et al 2010). Lacerda & Jewitt (2007) concluded a density of 2.551 g cm −3 and follow up work found consistent values between 2.55 and 2.59 g cm −3 , depending on the model used. Such a rocky body with an icy exterior could be a product of initial differentiation before giant impact and subsequent removal of a significant amount of the icy mantle.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Even more interesting is that shape modeling has suggested a density higher than nearly anything else known in the Kuiper belt and consistent with a body almost thoroughly dominated by rock (Rabinowitz et al 2006;Lacerda et al 2008;Lellouch et al 2010). Lacerda & Jewitt (2007) concluded a density of 2.551 g cm −3 and follow up work found consistent values between 2.55 and 2.59 g cm −3 , depending on the model used. Such a rocky body with an icy exterior could be a product of initial differentiation before giant impact and subsequent removal of a significant amount of the icy mantle.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Specifically, upon an assumption on the object density (ρ), we used the rotation period P = 2π/ω to calculate ω 2 /(π G ρ), where G is the gravitational constant. When lower than a limit of 0.3742, the latter quantity provides c/a and b/a by interpolation from Chandrasekhar's (1987) tables (see also Lacerda & Jewitt 2007). We considered two density cases (ρ = 1000 and 3000 kg m −3 ) and restricted ourselves to objects with some minimum lightcurve amplitude (Δm min ), considering that lightcurves with lower amplitudes may instead be due to albedo markings on a MacLaurin spheroid.…”
Section: Attempting To Use Rotational Informationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These can be used to estimate the density by two methods. By either balancing gravitational and centrifugal forces for an assumed strengthless (rubble pile) body, as applied to asteroids (Pravec et al 2002) and comets (Snodgrass et al 2006), or by assuming a fluid equilibrium shape (i.e., a Jacobi ellipsoid), which may be more appropriate for large icy bodies such as TNOs (Lacerda & Jewitt 2007). The densities of TNOs derived from lightcurves was reviewed by Duffard et al (2009) and Thirouin et al (2010).…”
Section: Rotation and Densitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The exception is 2003 SQ 317 , which has a large lightcurve amplitude (Snodgrass et al 2010), implying that it is likely to be a contact binary (therefore the Jacobi ellipsoid model does not hold, Lacerda & Jewitt 2007).…”
Section: Rotation and Densitymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation