2004
DOI: 10.1007/s00586-004-0705-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Demonstration of vertebral and disc mechanical torsion in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis using three-dimensional MR imaging

Abstract: This study was designed to demonstrate and measure mechanical torsion in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis using three-dimensional magnetic resonance (MR) imaging. Ten patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis were imaged with three-dimensional MR imaging, and the data post-processed through multiplanar reconstruction to produce images angled through individual endplates. Transverse rotation was measured at each endplate and these measurements used to calculate the amount of vertebral and disc … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0
1

Year Published

2005
2005
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
19
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Birchall et al [4] manually identified the landmarks according to the method of Ho et al and reported surprisingly low intra-and inter-observer variability of 0.4°SD (2.6°MAD) and 0.3°SD (3.0°MAD), respectively. In a later study [5], a total variability of 1.3°S D (0.8°MAD) was reported for the rotation of vertebral endplates. To obtain the rotation between two neighboring lumbar vertebrae, Haughton et al [10] matched two axial MR cross sections with a precision of around 0.5°.…”
Section: 0°1mentioning
confidence: 89%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Birchall et al [4] manually identified the landmarks according to the method of Ho et al and reported surprisingly low intra-and inter-observer variability of 0.4°SD (2.6°MAD) and 0.3°SD (3.0°MAD), respectively. In a later study [5], a total variability of 1.3°S D (0.8°MAD) was reported for the rotation of vertebral endplates. To obtain the rotation between two neighboring lumbar vertebrae, Haughton et al [10] matched two axial MR cross sections with a precision of around 0.5°.…”
Section: 0°1mentioning
confidence: 89%
“…1) were used to measure the AVR in 3D MR images. Although these methods were originally developed for orthogonal axial computed tomography (CT) cross sections, their application to MR cross sections is straightforward, as they are based on specific anatomical landmarks that can be identified in both CT and MR images [4,5]. As the sagittal and/or coronal vertebral tilt may introduce errors in the determination of AVR [13,18], the manual measurements were not performed in orthogonal, but in oblique, 2D axial MR cross sections.…”
Section: Manual Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Therefore, alternative non-invasive, radiationfree, and reliable methods to study scoliosis are urgently sought. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) could reconstruct high-quality tomographic images of spinal vertebrae [17,18]. However, the use of MRI is costly and time consuming; therefore, its use to evaluate AIS still remains very limited.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3, 4). Given a good match of the preoperative and operative variables between the N-and A-groups (the normal and the pelvic rotational patients), our interpretation of the postoperative coronal decompensation could be the instability of the spine foundation (i.e., the pelvis) outside the areas of instrumentation [35]. From a biomechanical point of view, the spine and pelvis linking the head to the lower extremities could be regarded as a chain [36].…”
Section: Pelvic Axial Rotation (Par)mentioning
confidence: 99%