2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.smallrumres.2012.05.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Demographic effects of live shearing on a guanaco population

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
10
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The survival rate of shorn guanacos in the Reserve was higher than the rates estimated in the only other reported study on shorn guanacos, at Cabeza de Vaca ranch (Rey et al, 2012b). At Cabeza de Vaca the annual survival rate estimated from telemetry of 17 shorn adult guanacos was 0.70 ± SE 0.11, whereas survival estimated from 1,334 capture-recapture histories was 0.82 ± SE 0.01.…”
Section: Effects On Survival and Reproductioncontrasting
confidence: 58%
“…The survival rate of shorn guanacos in the Reserve was higher than the rates estimated in the only other reported study on shorn guanacos, at Cabeza de Vaca ranch (Rey et al, 2012b). At Cabeza de Vaca the annual survival rate estimated from telemetry of 17 shorn adult guanacos was 0.70 ± SE 0.11, whereas survival estimated from 1,334 capture-recapture histories was 0.82 ± SE 0.01.…”
Section: Effects On Survival and Reproductioncontrasting
confidence: 58%
“…The reduction in mean group size between 1982 and 2002–2007 may limit group vigilance, reducing individual foraging time and increasing vulnerability to predators, particularly pumas (Marino & Baldi, 2008; Marino, 2010). The proportion of yearlings at the long-term sites (1983–2007 mean was 0.25 ± SE 0.04) was high compared to other studies (0.00–0.30; Rey et al, 2012; earlier studies cited in Saba et al, 1995) and also in comparison with the Auca Mahuida Volcano site during 2002–2007, where high density may limit birth rates or yearling survival through density dependence. Small group sizes at the long-term sites, however, may limit recruitment from the abundant yearling class into reproductive adults because of reduced group vigilance, individual foraging and predator avoidance.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 49%
“…Vicuña and guanaco fibre from monitored populations can be obtained either from free ranging animals or from animals kept captive in appropriately fenced paddocks. Recent research confirmed that by applying proper welfare protocols during capture and shearing, population demographics of both species are not altered Rey et al, 2012). The capture and shearing practices of vicuñas and guanacos kept in captivity were described by Amendolara (2001) and , respectively.…”
Section: Fibre Productionmentioning
confidence: 81%