2018
DOI: 10.1037/pha0000171
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Demand characteristics in episodic future thinking: Delay discounting and healthy eating.

Abstract: Steep delay discounting, or rapid devaluation of future outcomes, is one mechanism that can account for the chronic selection of smaller-sooner over larger-later outcomes; that is, impulsive choice. Because steep delay discounting is correlated with maladaptive behavior, researchers have explored methods for reducing discounting. One empirically supported method is episodic future thinking (EFT), or vividly imagining one's future before completing the discounting task. However, EFT procedures may include deman… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
35
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
1
35
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the context of eating behaviour, by prompting individuals to vividly imagine their personal futures while they are making decisions about what to eat, they may be better able to connect how their eating behaviour today will influence their weight in the future, thereby helping them resist the temptation of appetitive food in the present. It should be noted, however, that there is some evidence that suggests the effects of episodic future thinking training on eating behaviour are heavily subject to demand characteristics, entailing that the effect of this intervention on eating behaviour may be inflated and may not generalize to long‐term measures such as weight loss over time …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the context of eating behaviour, by prompting individuals to vividly imagine their personal futures while they are making decisions about what to eat, they may be better able to connect how their eating behaviour today will influence their weight in the future, thereby helping them resist the temptation of appetitive food in the present. It should be noted, however, that there is some evidence that suggests the effects of episodic future thinking training on eating behaviour are heavily subject to demand characteristics, entailing that the effect of this intervention on eating behaviour may be inflated and may not generalize to long‐term measures such as weight loss over time …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It will be important to consider the potentially selective (domain specific) effects of episodic foresight in the development of cognitive and behavioural strategies that have future imagination at their core (Snider et al, 2016). Clinical translation of recent findings about the potentially causal role of foresight in decision-making will require appropriate caution given concerns regarding the potential for demand characteristics to explain these effects (Rung & Madden, 2018). The present findings are potentially in line with the idea that demand characteristics contributed to the effect of cued episodic foresight on decision-making, given that the manipulation only affected choice impulsivity domains with an explicit intertemporal trade-off, and not risk-taking -which lacks an explicit time component; and given that there was no temporal component in the neutral condition event cues for either task.…”
Section: No Effect Of Future Thinking On Risk-takingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A number of studies have examined the impact of episodic future thinking (EFT) on decision-making and preferences ( Rung, Madden, 2018 , Bulley, Gullo, 2017 , Wu, Cheng, Chiou, 2017 , Kuo, Lee, Chiou, 2016 , Stein, Wilson, Koffarnus, Daniel, Epstein, Bickel, 2016 ). Episodic future thinking, one of several forms of prospective thinking, involves vivid mental simulation or visualization of possible future events, which activates brain regions involved in prospective thinking ( Atance and O’Neill, 2001 ), thereby inducing a future orientation ( Cheng, Shein, Chiou, 2012 , Chiou, Wu, 2016 ).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%