2022
DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.990608
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Delta radiomics model for the prediction of progression-free survival time in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer patients after immunotherapy

Abstract: ObjectiveTo assess the validity of pre- and posttreatment computed tomography (CT)-based radiomics signatures and delta radiomics signatures for predicting progression-free survival (PFS) in stage III-IV non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients after immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy.MethodsQuantitative image features of the largest primary lung tumours were extracted on CT-enhanced imaging at baseline (time point 0, TP0) and after the 2nd-3rd immunotherapy cycles (time point 1, TP1). The critical f… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Delta-radiomics predictive performances were significantly better than clinical and baseline radiomics-only models both for treatment response and survival predictions. This finding is in line with the recent literature on immunotherapy response prediction, in which models incorporating feature variations over time have systematically outperformed models based on pre-treatment CT alone [ 19 , 21 , 29 ]. These results are comprehensible if the delta-radiomics models, as in our case, include volume-related features assessing early tumor shrinkage, which is the hallmark of tumor sensitivity to treatment.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Delta-radiomics predictive performances were significantly better than clinical and baseline radiomics-only models both for treatment response and survival predictions. This finding is in line with the recent literature on immunotherapy response prediction, in which models incorporating feature variations over time have systematically outperformed models based on pre-treatment CT alone [ 19 , 21 , 29 ]. These results are comprehensible if the delta-radiomics models, as in our case, include volume-related features assessing early tumor shrinkage, which is the hallmark of tumor sensitivity to treatment.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…This could be explained by the heterogeneity of our population, gathering patients presenting different tumor stages and receiving PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors as first-line or further lines of treatment. Regarding delta-radiomics, to date, only one study from—Xie et al—has tried to incorporate clinical parameters into the delta-radiomics model in the setting of NSCLC treated with ICI [ 29 ]. Their combined signature showed good performances in predicting PFS and the combined models provided better clinical utility than delta-radiomics models within a reasonable threshold probability range.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ICC test was conducted between the datasets obtained by the two radiologists. The value exceeding 0.75 was deemed indicative of robust reproducibility and reliability, leading to the exclusion of features with ICC<0.75 from subsequent analysis ( 37 , 38 ). Furthermore, Pearson’s rank correlation coefficient was employed to evaluate the correlation between feature pairs, with one feature randomly excluded from each pair exhibiting a correlation coefficient > 0.9.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, some studies are focusing on the possibility of applying radiomics to daily clinical practice in order to improve not only the detection of lung lesions but also the ability to distinguish malignant from benign lesions, characterize their histology, stage, and genotype, as well as the response to treatments and the possibility of applying the models to lung cancer screening in order to overcome the limitation of over-diagnosis of indeterminate nodules [ 129 , 130 , 131 , 132 , 133 , 134 ].…”
Section: Lung Cancermentioning
confidence: 99%