2021
DOI: 10.1101/2021.08.10.455795
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

DeLTA 2.0: A deep learning pipeline for quantifying single-cell spatial and temporal dynamics

Abstract: Improvements in microscopy software and hardware have dramatically increased the pace of image acquisition, making analysis a major bottleneck in generating quantitative, single-cell data. Although tools for segmenting and tracking bacteria within time-lapse images exist, most require human input, are specialized to the experimental set up, or lack accuracy. Here, we introduce DeLTA 2.0, a purely Python workflow that can rapidly and accurately analyze single cells on two-dimensional surfaces to quantify gene e… Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
(65 reference statements)
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…DeLTA was not included in this study because it operates similarly to MiSiC and was designed specifically for mother machine microfluidics analysis. DeLTA 2.0 was recently released to additionally segment confluent cell growth on agarose pads, but it remains quite similar to MiSiC in implementation (55). PlantSeg could, in principle, be trained on bacterial micrographs, but we determined that its edge-focused design meant to segment bright plant cell wall features would not offer any advancements over the remaining U-Net methods that we tested.…”
Section: Choosing Segmentation Algorithmsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…DeLTA was not included in this study because it operates similarly to MiSiC and was designed specifically for mother machine microfluidics analysis. DeLTA 2.0 was recently released to additionally segment confluent cell growth on agarose pads, but it remains quite similar to MiSiC in implementation (55). PlantSeg could, in principle, be trained on bacterial micrographs, but we determined that its edge-focused design meant to segment bright plant cell wall features would not offer any advancements over the remaining U-Net methods that we tested.…”
Section: Choosing Segmentation Algorithmsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…studying filamentation, irregularly shaped cells or biofilms. In such cases, we refer to DL networks developed for the particular segmentation task 28 32 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Instance segmentations can subsequently be used for downstream applications such as tracking cell lineages or morphological changes. If this is not already included in the network 32 , 33 , segmentation masks can be used with TrackMate, which was recently updated for the use of DL technology 46 (Supplementary Video 3 ). The convenient use of StarDist and Cellpose segmentation models directly within TrackMate allows for integrative image analysis of time-lapse data.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Images were segmented and analyzed using the DeLTA 2.0 software and custom analysis scripts. 59 Statistical analysis OD600 values in MIC curves and bar plots are reported as the mean of three samples ± the standard deviation. Colony count values for CFU measurements are reported as the mean of six samples consisting of two dilutions and platings for each MIC data point.…”
Section: Colony Forming Unit Measurementmentioning
confidence: 99%