2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2009.04.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Delirium recognition and sedation practices in critically ill patients: A survey on the attitudes of 1015 Brazilian critical care physicians

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

6
70
3
15

Year Published

2012
2012
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 83 publications
(94 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
6
70
3
15
Order By: Relevance
“…Of the 234 patients, only 56 were assessed for delirium, with 12 (21%) of these screening positive. In a survey of 1015 Brazilian ICU physicians, 29 only 13% reported using a validated screening tool for delirium, and more than 90% cited "clinical evaluation" as a method of diagnosis. 29 However, 38% reported not screening for delirium whatsoever, while the remainder reported screening once or more per day.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Of the 234 patients, only 56 were assessed for delirium, with 12 (21%) of these screening positive. In a survey of 1015 Brazilian ICU physicians, 29 only 13% reported using a validated screening tool for delirium, and more than 90% cited "clinical evaluation" as a method of diagnosis. 29 However, 38% reported not screening for delirium whatsoever, while the remainder reported screening once or more per day.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a survey of 1015 Brazilian ICU physicians, 29 only 13% reported using a validated screening tool for delirium, and more than 90% cited "clinical evaluation" as a method of diagnosis. 29 However, 38% reported not screening for delirium whatsoever, while the remainder reported screening once or more per day. When asked how delirium was managed, 88% of respondents said that haloperidol was used, and 45% and 36% used benzodiazepines and atypical antipsychotics, respectively (multiple answers were permitted).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Surveys of doctors highlight similar concerns. A survey of Brazilian critical care physicians found that less than 15% of respondents used validated delirium assessment tools [48]. An American survey of ICU clinicians found that despite the belief that the literature supported routine screening for delirium, only 40% of respondents did so, and of those, only a small number used specific delirium screening tools [49].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The knowledge and the interest on delirium in critically ill patients have progressively increased over the course of the last few years. 33,35 Nonetheless, there is still a lack of homogeneity in the use of terminology especially by physicians and health-care personnel who do not specialise in neuropsychiatric disciplines and for different background training and categorisation system. In a previous international survey, 33 we found that two terms are very consistently used when referring to acute brain dysfunction in critically ill patients: 100% of the selected languages use the term 'coma' or 'koma' to describe patients unresponsive to verbal and/or physical stimuli, and 100% use delirium tremens to define delirium due to alcohol withdrawal.…”
Section: Delirium Terminologymentioning
confidence: 99%