2016
DOI: 10.1080/10106049.2015.1132481
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Delineation of groundwater potential zones using remote sensing and GIS-based data-driven models

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
25
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 77 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 87 publications
0
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Recently, machine learning (ML) and soft computing techniques such as artificial intelligence have been successfully applied for the prediction of hazard and risk in environmental sciences (Choubin et al, 2017a(Choubin et al, , 2017bGhorbani Nejad et al, 2017;Choubin et al 2018b;Singh et al, 2018). However, the implementation of ML approaches for assessment of groundwater pollution risk are limited; and an integrated framework for groundwater risk assessment is still lacking.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, machine learning (ML) and soft computing techniques such as artificial intelligence have been successfully applied for the prediction of hazard and risk in environmental sciences (Choubin et al, 2017a(Choubin et al, , 2017bGhorbani Nejad et al, 2017;Choubin et al 2018b;Singh et al, 2018). However, the implementation of ML approaches for assessment of groundwater pollution risk are limited; and an integrated framework for groundwater risk assessment is still lacking.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The second dataset was the digital elevation model (DEM)-based dataset, including topographical factors [32]: elevation, gradient, aspect, relief amplitude (RA), surface roughness (SR), plan curvature (PLC), and profile curvature (PRC). However, having more factors does not necessarily mean a more complete and accurate landslide susceptibility map [13,21,33]. Due to being derived from the same DEM data source, the topographical factors were not independent of each other.…”
Section: Landslide Inventory Mapmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2017, 6, 347 2 of 16 factors and landslides, not only avoid the dependence of mechanical models on high-precision data, but also reduce the subjectivity brought by expert evaluation statistical methods [8,9]. The statistical methods include the weighted liner combination model (WLC) [10,11], the logistic regression model [12][13][14], fuzzy synthetic evaluation model [15,16], and neural network model [17,18].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In some studies, data mining models such as frequency ratio (FR) (Oh et al, 2011;Davoodi Moghaddam et al, 2015), weights-of-evidence (WOE) (Ozdemir, 2011;Lee et al, 2012a;Pourtaghi and Pourghasemi, 2014), evidential belief function (EBF) (Nampak et al, 2014;Pourghasemi and Beheshtirad, 2014;Tahmassebipoor et al, 2015;Ghorbani Nejad et al, 2016), and certainty factor (CF) (Razandi et al, 2015) have been used for assessing groundwater potentiality. Furthermore, numerous studies have described the application of the logistic regression (LR) (Ozdemir, 2011;Pourtaghi and Pourghasemi, 2014), artificial neural network model (ANN) (Lee et al, 2012b), random forest , and analytical hierarchy process (AHP) (Adiat et al, 2012;Rahmati et al, 2014;Shekhar and Pandey, 2014) for preparing the GPM.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%