2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.cag.2015.06.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Deformation simulation using cubic finite elements and efficient p-multigrid methods

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
(41 reference statements)
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For simulating general nonlinear materials, a lot of effort has been put into the eigen-analysis of the energy Hessian in order to fix indefiniteness and use the conjugate gradient method Smith et al 2018Smith et al , 2019Teran et al 2005]. Advanced techniques like higher-order elements [Bargteil and Cohen 2014;Weber et al 2011] or multi-resolution solvers [Weber et al 2015;Zhu et al 2010] were also employed in computer graphics. To address the issues with volume mesh generation, some authors embedded the original surface mesh into a lattice of hexahedra with special quadrature rules [McAdams et al 2011;Nesme et al 2009;Patterson et al 2012].…”
Section: Related Work 31 Finite Element Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For simulating general nonlinear materials, a lot of effort has been put into the eigen-analysis of the energy Hessian in order to fix indefiniteness and use the conjugate gradient method Smith et al 2018Smith et al , 2019Teran et al 2005]. Advanced techniques like higher-order elements [Bargteil and Cohen 2014;Weber et al 2011] or multi-resolution solvers [Weber et al 2015;Zhu et al 2010] were also employed in computer graphics. To address the issues with volume mesh generation, some authors embedded the original surface mesh into a lattice of hexahedra with special quadrature rules [McAdams et al 2011;Nesme et al 2009;Patterson et al 2012].…”
Section: Related Work 31 Finite Element Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this article, we choose to use only linear tetrahedral meshes as they are widely used in computer graphics. Extensions to higher order can be made using numerical quadrature or analytically using Bernstein-Bézier polynomials as in Roth et al [1998], Roth [2002], and Frâncu et al [2019], and similar to standard FEM [Bargteil and Cohen 2014;Weber et al 2011Weber et al , 2015].…”
Section: Linear Tetrahedral Elementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The CPU backends call conventionally compiled functions to apply residuals (10) and Jacobians (11) at quadrature points, thereby enabling a rich debugging experience. CPU backends implement the element action B using tensor contractions with architecture-specific vectorization (e.g., AVX intrinsics, LIBXSMM [33]).…”
Section: Portability and Productivitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Meanwhile, algebraic multigrid (AMG) setup costs increase due to sparse matrix-matrix products, and the resulting solvers are observed to converge more slowly for highorder discretizations [10]- [12], even when using specialized methods [13]. A practical alternative to algebraic multigrid is p-multigrid [14], which is observed to be robust for finite element discretizations on unstructured meshes [11], [12] and pairs naturally with efficient matrix-free data structures [15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a recent conference paper, Altenhofen et al presented an approach to generate tetrahedral simulation meshes directly from volumetric Catmull‐Clark models [ASSF17]. As Altenhofen et al already use a GPU‐based FEM solver (originally presented by Weber et al [WMA∗15]), their approach would benefit significantly from performing subdivision and mesh operations directly on the GPU.…”
Section: Background and Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%