2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijnonlinmec.2017.10.020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Deformation and fracture of square plates under repetitive impact loading

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
3
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In this study, the necessary dynamic stress-strain curve as well as the correct value of the optimum D/D o was obtained by solving equation ( 10) and equation ( 19) for a range of D/D o values at three impact velocities (10, 20, and 30 m/s) using the Excel Õ program. As the result, the nearly constant strain rates were achieved at D/D o values of 0.34, 0.48, and 0.58 at impact velocities of 10, 20, and 30 m/s, respectively, for the SHB instrument (Tables 1 and 2) and a 5 mm-thick Armco Õ iron specimen (a 3 , and c p ¼ 452 Jkg -1 K -1 ). 8,a The obtained stress-strain curves and ratestrain curves for the iron specimen are shown in Figure 12(a) and Figure 12(b), respectively.…”
Section: Predicting the Maximum Strainmentioning
confidence: 83%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In this study, the necessary dynamic stress-strain curve as well as the correct value of the optimum D/D o was obtained by solving equation ( 10) and equation ( 19) for a range of D/D o values at three impact velocities (10, 20, and 30 m/s) using the Excel Õ program. As the result, the nearly constant strain rates were achieved at D/D o values of 0.34, 0.48, and 0.58 at impact velocities of 10, 20, and 30 m/s, respectively, for the SHB instrument (Tables 1 and 2) and a 5 mm-thick Armco Õ iron specimen (a 3 , and c p ¼ 452 Jkg -1 K -1 ). 8,a The obtained stress-strain curves and ratestrain curves for the iron specimen are shown in Figure 12(a) and Figure 12(b), respectively.…”
Section: Predicting the Maximum Strainmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…Relying solely on experimental approaches for the design/understanding of the highstrain-rate behaviour of solids and structures may not be practical because of the burden of cost and time; however, an experimental verification of the design result is inevitable. Modelling and simulation (M & S) [1][2][3][4][5][6][7] helps one to understand the evolution of the high-strain-rate phenomena on a step-by-step basis and is a time-and cost-efficient design approach. Therefore, it is advantageous to combine the M & S-based design with experimental verification of the mechanical behaviour of solids and structures exposed to high-strain-rate events.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…А у 2005 році Д.В. Бреславський сам становиться завідувачем цієї кафедри, деканом інженерно-фізичного факультету він працював з 2000 р. Увесь творчий та професійний шлях Дмитра Васильовича проходить разом з видатними вченими, авторами багатьох наукових монографій та навчальної літератури [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20].…”
Section: Issn 2078-9130unclassified
“…Spranghers et al [12] proposed an inverse method that uses full-field optical measurements taken during the first milliseconds of a free air explosion to identify the plastic response of aluminum plates subjected to sudden blast loads, and the results verify that the proposed methods can be successfully used to analyse the plastic behaviour of metals subjected to blast waves. Breslavsky et al [13] experimentally and numerically studied the deformation and fracture of impact-loaded thin steel square plates and discussed the numerical-experimental approach for fracture prediction in plates under repetitive impact loading. Zheng et al [14] investigated the large deflection behaviour of clamped stiffened plates subjected to confined blast loads through experiments, theoretical analysis, and numerical simulations; it was proven that the proposed calculation model is of high precision and practicability by comparing the numerical results.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%