2000
DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(05)73574-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Deferiprone for thalassaemia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
13
0
1

Year Published

2000
2000
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
13
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The use of this drug has been recommended in patients suffering from iron overload, who cannot receive DF (in cases where the cost of this drug cannot be met) or cannot tolerate the drug [13]. The most commonly used and for a few decades the only chelator available in the clinic, is the hexadentate DF.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The use of this drug has been recommended in patients suffering from iron overload, who cannot receive DF (in cases where the cost of this drug cannot be met) or cannot tolerate the drug [13]. The most commonly used and for a few decades the only chelator available in the clinic, is the hexadentate DF.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1,2-Dimethyl-3-hydroxypyridin-4-one (deferiprone or CP20 or L1), an orally active iron chelator, has been presented as an alternate chelator subsequent to the meeting of the 10th International Conference on Oral Chelation (22-26 March, 2000, Limassol, Cyprus). The use of this drug has been recommended in patients suffering from iron overload, who cannot receive DF (in cases where the cost of this drug cannot be met) or cannot tolerate the drug [13]. Ongoing research includes the development of suitable bidentate iron chelators that can be administered orally, are absorbed easily from the gastrointestinal tract, possess a high pFe 3+ value and low toxicity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indications, dose and frequency There is still uncertainty about the long‐term efficacy of this drug (Pippard & Weatherall, 2000a). Thus, while some are wary of recommending deferiprone, even as second line‐therapy (Pippard & Weatherall, 2000b), others are enthusiastic about extending its use (Wonke et al , 1998; Kontoghiorghes et al 2000). This uncertainty is also reflected by the recent licensing of the drug by the European Medicines Evaluation Agency (EMEA) in Europe but not by the Federal Drug Administration (FDA) in the USA.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a result of these drawbacks of deferoxamine, only a small percentage of patients needing chelation therapy worldwide are receiving effective treatment. L1 is now being offered as an alternative form of treatment for such patients as it is orally active and much cheaper to produce [5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%