2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2004.08.062
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Defect levels in the band gap of amorphous selenium

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
20
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
4
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the next section, we discuss the possible origins of these features. It should be noted that the peak at 0.42-0.48 eV below E c in this work is not too far away from location of the peak at 0.53-0.6 eV below E c , that had been predicted from posttransit current measurements by Adriaenssens's group in 1999 [55,70]. The peak at 0.27-0.33 eV below E c , the same peak uncovered in Ref.…”
Section: Dos In the Vicinity Of Conduction Band As Derived From Tofsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…In the next section, we discuss the possible origins of these features. It should be noted that the peak at 0.42-0.48 eV below E c in this work is not too far away from location of the peak at 0.53-0.6 eV below E c , that had been predicted from posttransit current measurements by Adriaenssens's group in 1999 [55,70]. The peak at 0.27-0.33 eV below E c , the same peak uncovered in Ref.…”
Section: Dos In the Vicinity Of Conduction Band As Derived From Tofsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…-5 eV/(V/m) 1/2 , which is in good agreement with the value deduced in [18] for the D − level in undoped a-Se. 3) The dip around 10 −4 s in the TPC currents from 0.5% As-doped samples is rather pronounced in comparison with the corresponding features in other a-Se samples.…”
Section: Analysis and Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…1 just beyond 10 À3 s. While the signature of this center is not as clear on the I(t) traces as the one from the shallow trap, use of the (I Â t) À1 conversions leads to estimates of E Ã D À ¼ ð0:37 AE 0:02Þ eV and m D À = (2.6 ± 1.5) Â 10 11 Hz for the parameters of the D center. This E Ã D À value agrees well with the post-transit TOF or SSPC results for this level reported in earlier reports [5,6]. (The values reported on the basis of post-transit experiments are somewhat larger due to the ad-hoc use of m = 10 12 Hz in their determination.…”
Section: Transient Photocurrents and Their Analysissupporting
confidence: 90%
“…However, given that TOF involves the primary photocurrent only, the energy position of the deeper defect can be identified without difficulty through a TOF post-transit analysis. While the observation of Poole-Frenkel shifts [6] revealed the charged nature of the defects at 0.4-0.5 eV from the bands, the deduction of an attempt-to-escape frequency of 2.6 Â 10 11 Hz for the D center confirms that result. Indeed, detailed balance couples a large attempt frequency to a large capture cross-section, the latter one being characteristic for charged sites.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 58%
See 1 more Smart Citation