2007
DOI: 10.1055/s-2007-995346
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Deep sedation for endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography: intravenous propofol alone versus intravenous propofol with oral midazolam premedication

Abstract: Our data suggest that synergistic sedation with an oral dose of midazolam combined with intravenous propofol can provide a significant benefit, with a reduction in the dosage of propofol required and in patient anxiety levels before ERCP.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
53
3
5

Year Published

2011
2011
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 65 publications
(63 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
(32 reference statements)
0
53
3
5
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the safety and efficacy of propofol for routine endoscopic procedures when administered by endoscopists as well as anesthesiologists have been reported in multiple trials [11][12][13]. In addition, there are data supporting the safe use of propofol for advanced endoscopic procedures such as endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) and/or endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) [14][15][16][17][18][19]. The incidences of complications, such as hypoxemia, bradycardia, and the need for airway intervention were not different between propofol and standard sedatives in previous studies.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, the safety and efficacy of propofol for routine endoscopic procedures when administered by endoscopists as well as anesthesiologists have been reported in multiple trials [11][12][13]. In addition, there are data supporting the safe use of propofol for advanced endoscopic procedures such as endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) and/or endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) [14][15][16][17][18][19]. The incidences of complications, such as hypoxemia, bradycardia, and the need for airway intervention were not different between propofol and standard sedatives in previous studies.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although many previous studies examined measurements of hemodynamic changes during endoscopic procedures [14,15,17,27,[31][32][33][34], few have given detailed descriptions of quantitative changes in hemodynamic parameters and oxygen saturation during endoscopic sedation. There are also no reports regarding the frequency of cough during endoscopic procedures performed under sedation.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to its rapid recovery profile, the use of propofol has increased for many endoscopic procedures over the last decade [10][11][12][13][14]. Propofol produces safe, effective, and well-tolerated sedation [15].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Midazolam and propofol have been shown to act synergistically, and the dose of propofol can be reduced when used in combination with midazolam [10]. Propofol can be administered as a continuous infusion or an intermittent bolus.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, it is recommended that propofol should be administered only by anesthesia specialists [14] . Although a large volume of data shows the safety of endoscopistdirected propofol [15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23] , it is important to be aware of sedation-related complications due to the increase in the number of elderly patients with multiple underlying comorbidities and its nature as an advanced endoscopic technique that demands longer procedure times and deeper sedation. In clinical practice, it is common to combine propofol with additional drugs (benzodiazepine/opioid/ketamine), so-called "balanced propofol sedation" (BPS), which allows the propofol dose to be reduced and seems to be associated with less-frequent need for assisted ventilation, although this has not been demonstrated in head-to-head comparisons [23][24][25][26][27] .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%