2018
DOI: 10.7717/peerj.5764
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Deep learning-based classification with improved time resolution for physical activities of children

Abstract: BackgroundThe proportion of overweight and obese people has increased tremendously in a short period, culminating in a worldwide trend of obesity that is reaching epidemic proportions. Overweight and obesity are serious issues, especially with regard to children. This is because obese children have twice the risk of becoming obese as adults, as compared to non-obese children. Nowadays, many methods for maintaining a caloric balance exist; however, these methods are not applicable to children. In this study, a … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The performance at angles (360°, 360°, 360°) showed middle values among 280°PT, 176°, and 280° and increases along with ratio with Tra:Val (Table 2, Figure S7 a–g). The DL models have shown higher prediction performance and calculation costs than the traditional ML methods, such as RF and the SVM, due to the model structure complexity and gradient descent algorithm [56]. Furthermore, to analyze the combination of angles or the number of images in the DeepSnap with the prediction performance, a total of 14 kinds of combinations of pictures with various angles, including three kinds of picture numbers were utilized using the optimized parameters (Angle: 280°, MPS: 100, ZF: 100, AT: 23%, BR: 14.5 mÅ, BMD: 0.4 Å, BT: 0.8 Å, LR: 0.0008, BS: 108, GoogleNet) in the ratio with Tra:Val:Test = 1:1:1 (Table 2).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The performance at angles (360°, 360°, 360°) showed middle values among 280°PT, 176°, and 280° and increases along with ratio with Tra:Val (Table 2, Figure S7 a–g). The DL models have shown higher prediction performance and calculation costs than the traditional ML methods, such as RF and the SVM, due to the model structure complexity and gradient descent algorithm [56]. Furthermore, to analyze the combination of angles or the number of images in the DeepSnap with the prediction performance, a total of 14 kinds of combinations of pictures with various angles, including three kinds of picture numbers were utilized using the optimized parameters (Angle: 280°, MPS: 100, ZF: 100, AT: 23%, BR: 14.5 mÅ, BMD: 0.4 Å, BT: 0.8 Å, LR: 0.0008, BS: 108, GoogleNet) in the ratio with Tra:Val:Test = 1:1:1 (Table 2).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Convolution layers could detect different patterns, such as textures, edges, shapes etc. in images ( Jang et al, 2018 , Raghu et al, 2020 ). They also have multilayer perceptrons (fully connected) which all neurons in each layer are connected to all neurons in the next layer.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3. The network architecture consisted of an input stage, a feature extraction stage with three convolutional layers, and an output classification stage (Nagasawa et al, 2018; Jang et al, 2018). The input stage received the Horn-Schunck algorithm applied color image which was converted to 170*150 pixels.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%