2020
DOI: 10.1007/s00330-020-07213-w
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Deep learning algorithm for detection of aortic dissection on non-contrast-enhanced CT

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
19
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
1
19
1
Order By: Relevance
“…It was found that the proportion of increased lung texture, stripe shadow, ground glass shadow, atelectasis, and pleural effusion in the observation group was substantially lower than that in the control group after nursing, and the difference was great (P < 0.05). is was similar to the findings of Hata et al [22], indicating that specific nursing intervention can more effectively promote the recovery of children with MP compared with routine nursing. In addition, there was no considerable difference between the observation group and the control group in the proportion of small patchy shadow, large patchy consolidation shadow, and bronchiole dilation (P > 0.05), which was different from the research of Branco et al [23].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…It was found that the proportion of increased lung texture, stripe shadow, ground glass shadow, atelectasis, and pleural effusion in the observation group was substantially lower than that in the control group after nursing, and the difference was great (P < 0.05). is was similar to the findings of Hata et al [22], indicating that specific nursing intervention can more effectively promote the recovery of children with MP compared with routine nursing. In addition, there was no considerable difference between the observation group and the control group in the proportion of small patchy shadow, large patchy consolidation shadow, and bronchiole dilation (P > 0.05), which was different from the research of Branco et al [23].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Notably, the specificity of the deep-integrated model was improved to 92.3% in the internal testing cohort, which was slightly lower than that of the radiologists and apparently higher than the corresponding results from a prior study of 85.5% ( 12 ). However, in the external testing cohort, the specificity performance decreased to 55.4%.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 65%
“…Studies have reported that the DL technology contributes greatly to expanding the amount of information accessible in CT images beyond human recognizability limitations. Recently, Hata et al (12) designed the 2D DL algorithm for the detection of AD on non-contrast CT and reached an AUC of 0.940 on the internal testing set. The results of the 2D model showed comparable diagnostic performance to radiologists, which was consistent with the FIGURE 4 | The µ and σ parameters of the deep-integrated model.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Beside traditional clinical predictors, the use of machine learning models has been proposed in risk-stratifying patients with aortic aneurysms and predicting risk of AAS. Future studies are warranted to develop machine learning models for predicting adverse outcomes among patients with BAV-related aortopathy [ 32 , 33 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%