2006
DOI: 10.1504/ijvcm.2006.009021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Decoupling the value chain

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0
3

Year Published

2008
2008
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

4
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
15
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The simultaneous work of lean and agile principles can support the effective and efficient management (Olhager, 2003;Narasimhan, Swink & Kim, 2006) and relationships within a supply chain (Wikner & Tang 2008), balancing efficiency and responsiveness (Olhager, Selldin & Wikner, 2006). Researchers have addressed differently the links between agility and leanness.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The simultaneous work of lean and agile principles can support the effective and efficient management (Olhager, 2003;Narasimhan, Swink & Kim, 2006) and relationships within a supply chain (Wikner & Tang 2008), balancing efficiency and responsiveness (Olhager, Selldin & Wikner, 2006). Researchers have addressed differently the links between agility and leanness.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence, they follow the chase S&OP strategy (Olhager, 2003), which implies keeping free capacity and consequently lower utilization of equipment. Based on the expected delivery lead-time from the market, and in order to keep utilization at an accepted level, these companies usually focus on the backlog level instead of the inventory level (Olhager, Rudberg, & Wikner, 2001;Olhager, Selldin, & Wikner, 2006). The production and backlog levels are the focus of S&OP in these types of companies (Soman et al, 2004;Wallace & Stahl, 2008).…”
Section: Sandop and Flow Drivermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While the lean approach is focused on efficiency and a low inventory level, the agile approach values flexibility and responsiveness in planning (Maskell & Baggaley, 2004;Naylor, Naim, & Berry, 1999;Sabri & Shaikh, 2013). A level S&OP strategy is therefore suitable before the CODP, and a chase strategy after this point (Olhager et al, 2006). The objective here is to integrate the SD-based part and CD-based part into a framework.…”
Section: Sandop and Flow Drivermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The CODP can be seen as the incarnation of the delivery strategy since the position of the CODP is based on the delivery lead time. The positioning of the CODP has been identified as a key strategic decision, for example, in terms of the CODP itself (Olhager, 2003), as a consequence of balancing efficiency and responsiveness (Chopra & Meindl, 2007), as the point where lean meets agile (leagility) (Mason-Jones, Naylor, & Towill, 2000), or where the physical and innovative parts of the supply chain meet (Olhager, Selldin, & Wikner, 2006). The positioning of the PODP is also strategic in the sense that it represents the selected level of vertical integration, i.e.…”
Section: Strategic Process-based Decoupling Pointsmentioning
confidence: 99%