Proceedings of the 29th ACM International Conference on Information &Amp; Knowledge Management 2020
DOI: 10.1145/3340531.3412695
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Decoupled Graph Convolution Network for Inferring Substitutable and Complementary Items

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
47
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
47
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We adjust the model so that PGPR can infer the product relationship. DecGCN models the substitutability and complementarity of products in separated embedding spaces [27]. To test the performance of the MFI model, we treat MFI as a supervised prediction model to infer relationship.…”
Section: Results and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…We adjust the model so that PGPR can infer the product relationship. DecGCN models the substitutability and complementarity of products in separated embedding spaces [27]. To test the performance of the MFI model, we treat MFI as a supervised prediction model to infer relationship.…”
Section: Results and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further, PMSC adopts a novel loss function with relation constraints to distinguish between the substitutes and complements [9], and LVAE links two variational auto-encoders to learn latent features over product reviews [8]. SPEM considers both textual information and relational constraints [10], and DecGCN exploits the graph structure to learn product representations in different relationship spaces [11]. Nevertheless, all these methods suffer from two drawbacks.…”
Section: Product Relationship Inferencementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In this way, the whole structures to compute 𝑧 𝑣 𝑎 and 𝑧 𝑣 𝑞 are symmetric, which is also the reason we name this network Siamese neighbor matching layer. It's important to note that Siamese neighborhood matching mechanism differs from the dual matching scheme used in [14,16,31]. These studies design symmetric network structures for heterogeneous objects in two-tower; however, their neighborhood embedding is computed based on different metapaths and network parameters thus tend to be hard for heterogeneous matching.…”
Section: Siamese Neighbor Matchingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Click-through rate (CTR) prediction, which is one of the critical task for ranking in Search Engines and Recommender Systems, has received much attention from both the research and industry community [4,12,14,21,29,37]. Deep learning based methods [4,5,9,10,28,36,37] have achieved state-of-the-art performance in CTR prediction by modeling users' sequential behaviors.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%